>"art pop" >implying pop can be art

File: fsadfsadfs.png (3KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 420x420px

>implying POP is even a form of artistic expression that exists in this dimension

>implying that "artistic expression" can interact with human understanding in a way that surpasses gut feeling reactions to sensory stimuli that are exclusively determined by previously experienced sensory stimuli and are in fact meaningless and worthless beyond ascribed meaning that other individuals will place on them according to whether or not they coincide with those individual's own gut feeling reactions.

>>70141892
>implying I don't want to fuck that bunny

File: 1463457405347.png (21KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 420x420px

>>70141892
>implying anyone can approach Beethoven, Schubert, Debussy, Scarlatti, Stravinsky and Wagner in terms of artistic expression

>classical>folk>jazz>>>>>>>>pop

seriously fuck niggers and poptimists,

Huh

isn't it implying the opposite since it's saying to be art it needs to be this new genre and not pop

>"hair metal"
>implying metal can be hair

Any and all cultural product is art.

Art = any piece of culture actively being appreciated
Culture = any human activity that is not directly derived from biology

File: 1ad86-adorno.jpg (48KB, 542x441px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 542x441px

>>70142277
>jazz and pop aren't the same thing

I

>>70141970
>implying this dimension exists

what about pop art then??

>>70142724
bourgeois formalism