>genre: genius wdhmbt?

>genius
>7.5/10

>>70133169
7.5 is a very good score from him

>only radiohead is described as pop

File: GivingUpIsEasy.jpg (40KB, 650x366px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 650x366px

>It's another 'we're giving scaruffi unwarranted attention for his shitty reviews' thread.

>>70132637
>genre: songwriter

>>70133169
>avantgarde
>5/10

He's been writing a bunch of new bios for Cuneiform artists that maybe six people listened to, when's he going to review the relevant stuff everyone's waiting for?

>>70132637
When will Skrubby drop his shitty 90's Netscape tier site design?

>>70132637

it's fake guys

>>70133757
it literally isn't

>>70132637
Why do his scores always range from 5-7.

>>70134522
most music ranges from 5-7. it also makes his 7.5+ ratings that much more meaningful.

>>70133790

prove it

>>70135001
http://scaruffi.com/cdreview/new.html

>>70133483
I like it. Means the page loads very quickly.

>>70135021

wtf it is real

wow

>Cardiacs
I'm positive Scaruffi doesn't actually enjoy music and just became a music critic to fuck with people

>>70135155
>Scaruffi doesn't actually enjoy music

He said he doesn't even like listening to music. He just reviews albums to "document the culture" or some shit.

File: 1355712582190.gif (548KB, 209x204px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 209x204px

>>70135155
u pleb?

>>70133240

This is also a board with k-pop, Grimes, and Death Grips generals. It is not a serious board.

>>70135173
>He just reviews albums to "document the culture" or some shit.
That's exactly what I imagine someone who likes the Cardiacs would say
>>70135191
I am PaP (pleb and proud)