HOW CAN /MU/ EVER RECOVER?????

>8.5
>bad

>>70091114
Yeah basically this....
8 isn't that bad of a score.
I still like Bowie/Stevie/whoever albums that I give an 8.

But that brings up the question...where does 'bad' start? (My guess is anything below 6 or 5)

I was actually surprised they rated it so high, even I feel 10 years later

I'd give it a 9 personally.

>>70091105
I don't get it, it's too high or too low?

>>70091156
Anything beyond 5.9 is bad
6.0 - 7.9 - mediocre
8.0 - 8.4 - generic good score
8.5 - 8.9 - probably worth to listen
9.0 and above - masterpiece

>>70091489
Thanks for clarifying. I don't really pay attention to (or care about) Pitchforks ratings so I didn't know how they worked.

>>70091530
kek'd

>p4k
fuck off please

>>70091489
>probably worth a listen
>masterpice

that's a pretty big jump right there.

File: ghgfhfvbnhb bn.jpg (37KB, 615x410px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 615x410px

>>70091800
>p4k should fuck 4 koff 3