Underrated AOTYs 2016

>>70018749
How the fuck could they settle for that cover.

>>70018749
Actually I'd like to see any set of bonus songs up against this.

>>70018942
It is pretty shit unfortunately, including the edit job on her face

>Since the cover art for Britney Spears' 9th studio album "Glory" has been revealed, we Britney fans find that the cover art is not a suitable representation of the music that Britney is putting out and we are calling for it to be changed. We ask that RCA Records/Sony Music Entertainment change the album cover to one that would be a better and more suitable choice for the album.

>Thank you for your time,

https://www.change.org/p/rca-records-change-the-album-cover-for-glory-by-britney-spears

>>70019129
Even just that would have been a lot better.

>>70019359
Well yeah but that's what I'm saying, that's what you get when you buy the album. I guess I'm just trying to defend the package general.

>>70018942
I admit I'm not a fan of the cover
I think it would look better if the camera was zoomed out a bit and she kept her lips together

File: Britney-Spears-Marie-Claire-UK-October-2016-Cover-Photoshoot03.jpg (138KB, 800x1090px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 800x1090px

>>70019129
>>70019359
Pretty much anything would have been better, the real cover as it is makes the album seem like it's going to be total trash.

I really wish they went with something like this. Maybe a slightly more serious facial expression, but I think it could also work as-is since it's not a terribly serious album and is more fun/dancy. A different background/color might be more fitting for the feel of the album too.

File: tmp_13159-images(8)-1810981463.jpg (12KB, 342x148px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 342x148px

think she'll have a propet hit ever again?

>>70020199
It's inevitable