Albums where the first half is 10/10 and the second half is 0/10

>>69959876
Neither exist.

first for aumgn and peking o being amazing

>>69959876

TLoP

>>69959876
>he didn't get it
Experimental music sure isn't for everyone, anon.

File: NIN_ _The Fragile_ iPad Wallpaper _ Flickr - Photo Sharing!.jpg (246KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 640x640px

>>69959876

>>69959876
>he got scared by the first sound that wasn't bass, guitar, keyboard or drums
Missing out, not even difficult.

Eh both sides are like a solid 7/10

>>69960125
>>69960172
>he didn't get it
>i'm much smarter than him because I can enjoy less traditional music

you people are fucking insufferable

File: Get_to_Heaven_Everything_Everything.jpg (30KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 300x300px

You know it's true.

>>69960234
bro, everyone CAN enjoy less traditional music, some of us are just willing to try to understand it more thereby appreciating it more

in other words fuck off you insufferable pest

>>69960234
He got it going on for himself, because he started with "le epin 0/10". Naturally not everyone has to like it, but hes treating it as random noises or something, which is not.

>>69960234
>music being different and tries to push boundaries means it's bad
If you actually looked at the album and song structure, lyrics, and backstory more than not at all like you dumb philistine fuckers are wont to do, it's really obvious what they were going for.

>>69960250
Fuck off

>>69959876
>and the second half is 0/10
Not possible

>>69960250
More like First song 10/10 everything else shit

>>69960348
Now this is just a fishing rod

>>69960379
everything besides To the Blade is 21 pilots tier

>>69960283
>it's unfathomable to me that someone can listen to it and not enjoy it
>wow he doesn't listen to something so much that he forces himself to enjoy it

insufferable idiot

>>69960304
>it can only be 0/10 because he thinks it's random noises, not because he doesn't like it

insufferable idiot

>>69960327
>it's unfathomable to me that someone can listen to it and not enjoy it

insufferable idiot

>>69960473
What an embarrassing post

>>69960473
there is literally nothing wrong with forcing yourself to anything. you have the power. music might not be worth it but its about the easiest thing to get into if you try just a little bit, too

>>69960509
t. assblasted insufferable idiot

>>69960590
if you have to force yourself to enjoy a song or album it's worthless art

>>69960166
u wot

>>69960631
>"n-no shut up I totally won the argument you guys"
How pathetic

>worthless art
>worthless
>art
I don't think you know how those words work or what they mean.

>>69960590
>forcing yourself
I think you got the wrong attitude there, anon. It's more about keeping an open mind to new and different things, rather than forcing yourself to do certain things that you don't want to.

File: folder.jpg (178KB, 888x888px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 888x888px

Except its the other way around.

>>69960814
>not loving Jet Black Starlit and Bimbo
why do you even shill this album

>>69960631
>if you have to force yourself to enjoy a song or album it's worthless art
because you say so?

>>69960739
That anon you're responding to is what happens when people take the patrician vs plebeian memeing to heart and get way too insecure about their tastes.

Music is fun. Don't take it too seriously.

>>69960950
>Music is fun. Don't take it too seriously.
t. pleb

>>69960977
>anon makes fun of dumb insecure children for taking memes seriously
>dumb insecure child calls him a meme word
Too perfect. I refuse to believe it's real.

>>69961074
but you just took him seriously

>>69961074
>If I don't like it, it's a meme word!
You will not go far in life with this mindset

>>69961089
What?

>>69961136
>he actually takes memes seriously and it wasn't a joke
jesus christ am I in middle school again or what? This is hilarious.

>>69961177
>>he actually takes memes seriously
I don't think you understand what pleb/patrician means.

>>69959876

>not appreciating Peking O, the standout

>>69961177
your post was berating an anon for berating another anon who berated people for taking memes seriously
the anon you were berating was making a half-serious post
you responded seriously to a post that was basically a joke thereby making your post ironic in a sense

>>69961212
I do. It's a bad meme that shouldn't be taken seriously. And by your "rules", Tago Mago is incredibly "patrician" because it's hard to get into and be fully appreciated by people who don't usually listen to that kind of music.

>>69961238
>was making a half-serious post
He replied seriously to a post that was making fun of him and thus proving the other anon was right in making fun of him.
>you responded seriously
I don't think I did. I just pointed that out and made fun of him for being so slow and lacking in self awareness.

>>69961372
>I do
Explain it
>It's a bad meme that shouldn't be taken seriously
Why not? it's a very useful tool
>And by your "rules", Tago Mago is incredibly "patrician" because it's hard to get into
Incorrect. You obviously don't know what patrician means.

>>69961440
how is it useful other than making fun of strangers on the internet

>>69961476
>making fun of strangers
That's not what patricians do, so your question is a red herring

>>69961502
then how is it useful

>>69961440
>he thinks patrician means good
This fucking board, holy shit. You guys can't even keep your memes straight. Maybe check a dictionary before using words you don't understand.

>it's a very useful tool
You're killing me, buddy.

>>69961516
It becomes an excellent rhetoric for validity of music criticism
>>69961542
>he thinks patrician means good
Quote me where I said that.

You'll have trouble.
>I totally know what it means!!
You can't define it.

>>69961560
>It becomes an excellent rhetoric for validity of music criticism
i think i get where you're coming from
if you use it in terms of how much music they've listened to, then it makes criticism of a piece of music more valid. not more correct, but more trustworthy

>>69961599
>if you use it in terms of how much music they've listened to
This is not specifically what patrician means, but a patrician surely would have listened to a lot of music

>>69961626
>This is not specifically what patrician means
ok so i googled it and got "member of aristocracy"
now i don't get "It becomes an excellent rhetoric for validity of music criticism "

>>69961560
>You can't define it
The term patrician implies "of higher understanding/intelligence/whatever" aka notions that would be harder to understand by the mainstream/commoners/the plebeian social class, in comparison to the patricians which would usually be more educated or versed in that specific field and thus get to fully appreciate art for what it is.

Therefore making my statement from before right, and yours wrong. So like I said, stop using words that you don't know what they mean.

>It becomes an excellent rhetoric for validity of music criticism
Not when you "can't fucking define it". I didn't think it possible that someone could be so full of shit and memes.

>>69961657
Next you should google "jargon"
>>69961713
>The term patrician implies "of higher understanding/intelligence/whatever" aka notions that would be harder to understand by the mainstream/commoners/the plebeian social class, in comparison to the patricians which would usually be more educated or versed in that specific field and thus get to fully appreciate art for what it is.
Well I'm glad you finally took the chance to look up the meaning. I am impressed you got it right in your first guess.

So what is the problem here? Are you just a butthurt non-musician?

>Not when you "can't fucking define it"
Luckily for us, we can, so this is not relevant

>>69961621
>Face to Face
>Veridis Quo
>Voyager
>Something About Us
>0/10

Its time you stop posting

>>69961821
You literally said nothing in that post that could contribute to the conversation in any way, and on top of that you contradict yourself. Keep it together, man. And stop getting in arguments about things you don't fully comprehend.

>we can
Shall I quote you on that one?
>"You can't define it"

>>69961910
>You literally said nothing in that post that could contribute to the conversation in any way
I'm just following your example
>and on top of that you contradict yourself.
Show me where I did
>"You can't define it"
Well based on your previous posts, it was a reasonable assumption that you had no idea what you are talking about.

>>69961939
You don't get to change what the basic statements you said before mean, anon. This isn't your high school poetry class.
Whether you want to admit it or not, it's obvious that you're full of shit, got in way too deep over your head in this and bit more than you could chew. You can give up any time you want, but I'll be here all morning.

>>69962058
>You don't get to change what the basic statements you said before mean
Which is what? Quote me where I said it

>>69962129
>"You can't define it"
>[I prove you wrong]
>"Well based on your previous posts, it was a reasonable assumption that you had no idea what you are talking about."
You really are that slow, aren't you?

>>69962193
See >>69961939

>>69962227
What?

>>69962250
Well based on your previous posts, it was a reasonable assumption that you had no idea what you are talking about.

>>69962276
And? How is that relevant to >>69962193 ?

>>69962309
You would understand if you had any semblance of reading comprehension

Cry more about it non-musician pleb

>>69962328
>"you're too stupid to understand my intentionally aimless non-arguments"
>unironically calling someone pleb
Damn, buddy. You're hitting all the marks.

>non-musician
Where did you get that from and how is that relevant?

>>69959876
embarassing

>>69962840
This and Low I agree yes

>>69960327
>implying you know anything about song structure

>>69965064
oh no you sure showed me dang it

Also
>implying you need to in order to understand what a relatively simple album like this one is "about"

File: images.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

So disappointing

/mu/ newfag here, was this board always this insufferable? Like holy fuck, this is approaching /v/ levels of contempt for the topic it's ostensibly about.

>>69959876
Couldn't get past the pleb filter could you, OP?

>>69965830
/mu/ hates music, anon. If you want to get into music stop posting here and look for the helpful charts and recs and explore them. Otherwise you'll end up being a pretentious, self-important, insecure asshole like everybody else.

File: suffer.jpg (64KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 500x500px

>>69961621