Please, Please Me Vs For Sale?

I don't like the Beatles

>>69895685
For Sale has Eight Days a Week so For Sale

>>69895685
I don't like covers albums so Please Please Me (yes, I know there are covers there too, but they're less obnoxious for me)

File: 1470895555673.png (252KB, 451x432px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 451x432px

>>69895685
>Please, Please Me is overrated trash that's only loved for the Beatles name on it.
And yet its still better than For Sale.

With the Beatles is the best Beatlemania album

>>69895685
beatles for sale has 4 good songs in it
please please me has 4 bad songs

>>69895685
You know both of those have the Beatles' name on them, right?

>>69895685
Get the fuck off my board, beatlefag

>>69895685
PHONY BEATLEMANIA HAS BITTEN THE DUST

I'll have to say Beatles for Sale just by a little bit, feels comfier as well

>>69897016
>Not A Hard Day's Night
What

I recently listened to The Beatles main discography recently and I have to say s/t sucks

>>69898615
>plen
listen to it again

Well I actually like both albums equally but that being said you have Ringo and George each respectively doing old Carl Perkins numbers on For Sale. (Fun fact: Side one of Beatles for Sale is the same as side one of Beatles 65 except Kansas City was taken off Beatles 65 and put on a later U.S. release.)

beatlemania rankings

hard days night > please please me > help > for sale >> with the beatles

nothing they did after rubber soul was good anyway

>>69900985
nothing they did after my bonnie was good anyway

ftfy