Would this album be better overall if it had a more fitting cover art?

but it is fitting

A jarring cover for a jarring album.

>looks like it was made by a schizophrenic toddler in MSPaint
>sounds like it was made by a schizophrenic toddler in Garageband

What's wrong OP

>>69870658
this

even if you don't think it fits, it's iconic at this point

>>69870686

But its only considered iconic because of the name attached to it, not for the actual artwork

I actually love the cover.

It would be better if he actually tried.

I wonder what A good alt cover for the album would look like...

>>69870658
>>69870686
>>69870711
The album sounds dark and harsh, the cover looks bright
The only thing that is fitting is the lack of organization

That shade of orange is absolutely disgusting

File: 2hrq3xk.jpg (176KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1024x1024px

Why did you have to let us down, ye? This was my favourite

>>69870747
half of the album IS bright and poppy as fuck though?

>>69870703
what difference at this point does it make

>>69870809
What half though? the basslines in all songs are nearly grimey

>>69870872
Famous, Highlights, ULB, FSMH 1, waves all bright

Y>CD>MBDTF>LR>G>808>WTT>TLOP
The dirtiest sounding kanye album used to be MBDTF due to the lo-fi songs like gourgeous, and he still managed to make it sound GOOD.
On pablo, though, the dirty sound comes from spoopy witch house beats that sound all over the place when put together with fucking gospel lyrics or stupid features. If only the whole album sounded like Saint Pablo

kanye is out of his mind, long time

>>69870918
Have you really listened to Famous? the beat is the opposite of poppy and bright.
still, that's 5/20 songs...

original album cover better

>>69871002
nah even still that's a good quarter of the album