travis scott - lose
the "ess" sound is way too high and needs to be eq'd out, and it's a pet peeve that ruins an otherwise amazing track
any other pet peeves?
ok can we talk about his breakfast club thing, did he just walk up and plug his album on radio for a whole day for free? that's a baller move, it wasn't paid for right? is that what payola is?
>>69854683
my pet peeve is that barely anyone has talked about how great the production was on this album. everyone loses their minds because of the blatantly intentional distortion.
my other pet peeve is when people make critiques for production without production literacy ""ess" sound" are you talking about the ride or the hats or just the high end in general???
Production on this album was amazing. He purposely had it mixed and mastered that way to achieve the distortion on it. It's an aesthetically perfect album
>>69854699
was that breakfast club or hot 97?
>>69854683
you're an idiot
the only mastering/production issue is on outside
vocal's are too loud and way too distorted, especially 21's
doesn't match the rest of the album at all
>>69855219
>Aesthetically perfect album
What did he mean by this?
seriously, what does this even mean
>>69855219
Rodeo is a trap masterpiece , birds is 5/10 at best.
>>69855260
It's Travis's style and aesthetic perfected. It's very infectious.
>>69855310
Rodeo is a masterpiece, yes. Birds isn't on par, but it's definitely high up.
>>69855170
no the "s" sound in the girls singing, the high frequency is piercing. should be lowpassed out. my production literacy is fine,
>>69855247
oh i meant hot 97
>>69856009
i noticed that too, annoying on earbuds but it was fine in car speakers