last 5 rym ratings thread thread

File: last5.png (63KB, 869x323px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 869x323px

>>69821116
hello

File: rym last 5.png (46KB, 568x321px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 568x321px

hey hi

>>69821996
salad days isn't as good as another on imo but I'd give it maybe 3.5

File: Screenshot_2016-12-22-11-59-42-1.png (226KB, 977x659px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 977x659px

whats up

File: mop.png (59KB, 810x277px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 810x277px

>>69821996
Best taste I've seen in a while.

>>69822257
Not a fan of Arab, and Arca is a little high, but hey no foul.

>>69821996
>>69822193
>>69822197
>>69822257
>>69822625
op here

hi

>>69822696
hi

File: rym.png (64KB, 759x313px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 759x313px

Hey

File: passport.png (285KB, 1614x630px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1614x630px

was on a passport binge this morning

how the fuck can you remember how much you liked albums?
literally listened some things years ago and i don't remember shit about them

>>69823022
I rate albums right after listening to them

>>69823022
I rate stuff based on how much I feel I would play that particular album in the future

a 2 is good, but not something I would play often
a 5 can be as good as 2 but the sort of thing you play often

at least that's how I do it.

>>69823022
well I usually rate albums not long after listening to them
but my rating is mostly based on how I felt after just one listen, I mean if I listen to it again later I could have a very different reaction to it so there's not much accuracy to a lot of my ratings

File: Screen Shot 2016-12-22 at 1.01.44 PM.png (205KB, 1138x606px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1138x606px

I actually like the Motion City Soundtrack album but the production completely ruins it.

File: 5.png (58KB, 621x363px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 621x363px

>>69822257
Agree on Silent Shout. Contemporary synthpop as a genre won't get much better than that.

>>69823022
I had listened to about 1000 albums before I started rating to keep track of everything, and then for a few years, I was rating new music as I listened to it but then also relistening to old stuff that I didn't have clear in my head to re-rate it

Now I've got about 4000 albums rated, and I'm going through the last 50 or so I'd heard before I started rating that I need to relisten to...the ratings change if I go back to an album and find I like it significantly more or less

In general though, 3 stars or less I don't plan on listening to again (with a few specially marked exceptions I want to give another try) and 3.5 and above are the ones I keep in my collection in their entirety (as opposed to just the standout songs) because they are pretty much solid throughout

>>69824281
>rating singles
Kys