what do you guys think of this album?
>>69814228
I remember it being mostly unmemorable, not necessarily bad just not something I really expect to go back to
>>69814259
That's what I thought at first listen. I'm on my third listen now and I'm not sure if it's meh or mad decent
AOTY
>>69814334
Why do you say that?
It's fine, 6/10 indietronica
never listened to his other stuff tho so I don't really have much to compare it to
I love this album, people just say they dislike it because fantano didn't care for it
Bad song strucktures and vocals.
pretty shit
>>69814228
It's more interesting to me than what he was doing before, but it doesn't quite feel like he's there yet. I'll definitely check out whatever he does next, granted he continues this progression.
The textures in 10 d E A T h b R E a s T are fucking fantastic though; that song alone takes this from a low 5 to a high 6 for me.
>>69815535
Very pretty sounding shit
I was surprised how much I liked it. I've returned to it a few times which I did not expect.
very much a fan of it mostly
Production masterpiece. experimental in some ways and successful at doing it - feel like im always hearing something new whenever I listen to it. vocal melodies and harmonies are amazing - very memorable and clearly well thought out. relatively diverse instrumentation too.
however, in saying this, i was disappointed about some aspects, namely the length and the song writing.
very rigid, not a whole lot of progression, some of the songs could have been fleshed out further honestly. 34minutes in length... i mean hey I love justin vernon, easily one of my fave songwriters operating today, but this album is a solid 7/10 at best. Previous bon iver has been upwards of 9/10.