Caroline Polachek > Grimes

Grouper > Grimes

File: IMG_73721-640x455.jpg (60KB, 639x455px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 639x455px

>>69768166
its not even a competition
caroline >>> literally anyone else >>> grimes

>>69768166
False.
http://www.metacritic.com/person/chairlift
http://www.metacritic.com/person/grimes

The fact that you picked one of Grimes' worst pics proves that you're a moron.

>>69768233
You and your opinion both suck.

>>69768166
They're both ugly.

Left bitch has a horse face. Grimes looks like she escaped a mental ward.

>>69768166
human feces>grimes

>>69768491
>human feces
Is that the name of your band?

>>69770005
no, but if it was it would be better than grimes as well

>>69768206
this

I was on my first date with a girl and had Grimes playing on my iPod in the car and she made me turn around and take her back home. She never spoke to me again

>>69768206
Grouper is like a dull and boring version of Grimes. This is how you do properly good dreamy music, not that sleepy hookless nonsense:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsbiyvpel54
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBJ-LPPcAqw

>>69770652
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBJ-LPPcAqw [Remove]
Wow. Blatant Grouper rip off.

>>69770669
Which Grouper song?

>>69770889
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujsCaYznwTA

>>69771046
They're not similar, tbch. They sound like 2 different songs. That mumbly singing over quiet instrumentation wasn't even invented by Grouper.

>>69770669
>>69770889
>>69771046
Yeah... no. For one thing, that Grouper song doesn't even use any percussion. It also doesn't have polyphonic vocals.

>>69768206
Don't even taint Liz's name with Grimes by putting it in the same sentence, you fuck

>>69773378
why do you hate grimes so much

File: m61tT13.png (33KB, 651x481px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 651x481px

>>69768335