What does /mu/ think about the FAUL conspiracy?
Faul is just the tip of the iceberg.
It isn't a rabbit hole you want to go down.
>>69701937
>It isn't a rabbit hole you want to go down.
Well now I REALLY wanna go down. Spill the beans Anon.
>>69701951
elaborate
>>69701951
>No elaboration
Yeah this guy is full of shit.
>>69701980
>>69701989
There have been at least seven Fauls, and replacements for every Beatle. You don't want to know who's behind it all.
>>69702188
>You don't want to know who's behind it all.
>Implying you know either.
OP here.
Seems this question is beyond all of you so nvm.
It's just as fucking stupid as every other conspiracy theory.
>>69702188
Ringo was never replaced. The rest is true though.
>>69702713
[CITATION NEEDED]
>>69702188
Whatever Faul was between 1970 and 1980 was the best one.
>>69702746
That was Faul I, the longest-serving Faul.
>>69702802
Faul McCartney & Wings werent really popular enough to require such an elaborate ruse though, were they?
>>69702842
After the Beatles broke up it was decided that Faul I would be kept alive for the sake of not arousing suspicion, so he started his own band.
>>69702188
>>69702713
>>69702746
>>69702802
>>69702878
>Role playing on /mu/
>>69702802
No, Billy Shears choked in his own vomit during the Let it Be sessions in 1970, so Phill Ackrill took his place. Phill was tortured in a prison in Japan and died, so then Pauline took his place.
>>69703102
>Phill was tortured in a prison in Japan and died
How did he get himself into that situation?
>>69703102
What was the whole point of false Pauls?
>>69703191
http://ultimateclassicrock.com/paul-mccartney-tokyo-bust/
>>>>69703248
They (at least initially) were making a lot of money but were dying too fast.
>>69703248
There was only 1 Faul, the other anons are just fucking with you/role playing.
Apparently it was done to "spare the general public grief"
>>69703358
>>69703354
>it was done
done by whom??
>>69703375
>done by whom??
I say you should ask this guy >>69702188
but I'd bet money he doesn't actually know shit.
>>69701937
Depends on whether or not you own one of those "Make America Great Again" tinfoil hats
>>69701937
I think it's a valid conspiracy until DNA tests can be performed.
Interesting that he has never agreed to one.
>>69703607
>interesting that he wouldn't want to spend time addressing a conspiracy theory
>>69703702
>>interesting that he wouldn't want to spend time addressing a conspiracy theory, one that he and his wife have complained multiple times is a serious bother to them, with a quick and easy blood test.
FTFY
>>69702480
This. /mu/ obviously doesn't know anything.