Just got an analog mixer

>>69682022
use it to post pictures of it on instagram and seem like a cool music man

>>69682034
Disgusting

>>69682022
Does it have a bunch of input and output ports in back somewhere? If so you could always get into no-input mixing

you can use it for whatever desu.
it's entirely okay to have it in a guitar signal chain if you feel it colours the sound in a flattering way - this is even before you use the eqs on it.

use it whatever way it sounds good.

File: back.jpg (145KB, 1069x613px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1069x613px

>>69682060
It has two effect inputs in the back.
>>69682061
And thank you, just wanted to make sure that having it in a guitar setup wasn't just something horribly infeasible bc I'm new to even having pedals bc I'm a brokefag.

>>69682091
it might be infeasible from a live/gigging perspective since it is a fairly large thing to be lugging around - you might get a couple of looks from people, but fuck em - there are no hard and fast rules to what makes a good signal chain.

>>69682022
>Would you want it in a guitar effect setup, or would you only want to use it to record the guitar from a mic?

both if you want.

>>69682022
These kinds of mixers are nice for running into a rack power amp to run some passive PA speakers. Then you can mic whatever your small band needs.

I prefer that kind of setup to lugging around active speakers.

give it to me and I'll fly to where you live and give you a handy.
i really just want a mixer and to jerk someone off

>>69682594
Deal