Is there any music that sounds better using shitty poorfag headphones?

>>69667125
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlGYwXdgpY8

black metal

>>69668136
paysage d'hiver with cancer headphones is the best bm experience

its not music that sounds better but im a jazz musician prefer using shitty poorfag ear buds when im transcribing.

>>69667508
Oh I remember this band from 6 years ago
Never really liked them

>>69668136
This

>>69667125
no. anything that's intentionally lo-fi will still sound lo-fi on good headphones. there's no advantage to using shit

>>69668136
this and some lo fi like GBV

>>69669134
So what about>>69668136?

idk about headphones but I know that a lot of the songs I hear on the radio sound better in my car than with my headphones. it happens with a wide variety of music. most recently some janet jackson sounded better in my car

>>69669211
I think I already answered that question

>>69669134
I highly doubt that. Anything poorly mixed or mastered is gonna sounds like ass and I think that's key to lo fi.

File: pepe fetus.png (236KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 500x501px

>>69667125
>tfw have shitty poorfag headphones

File: Lorde.png (935KB, 766x787px) Image search: [Google]

935KB, 766x787px

Most modern music, since it's basically mixed for earbuds and smartphone/laptop speakers in mind.

Listen to this same shit on a decent playback system, and your ears get raped by dynamic compression.

>>69670564
Why is this anyway? Doesn't effect me but it must such between choosing shit or choosing good stuff but it will sound like shit. Are there any exceptions to this?

I went straight from poorfag headphones to HD800s and poorly mastered music arguably sounds better with poorfag headphones. To be more accurate, it doesn't sound 'better', but rather its harder to hear the shitty parts that you'll hear on better, more transparent headphones. Examples would be the original master of TOTBLs and No Closer to Heaven.