post your rate curve in this thread
five stars dont exis-
>>69641964
ya
hateyourmusic
I'm probably too generous with my ratings
I have it fixed sometime in 2017. Promised.
>>69642012
>>69641984
lol wtf
stop using a name
>>69642093
who are you?
>>69642106
Acre2000
>>69641971
>>69642031
only decent ones ITT
>>69642093
s-sorry
ok im an anon now
I know people criticise top-heavy curves, but why would I listen to and rate things I don't like?
>>69642915
he evolved
>>69641984
>50
drop name
>>69641881
>65
drop name
My curve is extremely, insanely, radically normal
>>69644449
who?
I tend to only bother rating stuff that I actually like a decent amount or intensely hate
Should I go rate a ton of boring but unoffensive shit like Arcade Fire and Grizzly Bear 2.0 so I have a better curve?
>>69643848
Fucking this, I'm actually pretty picky about what I give good ratings to, but a lot things I don't like I don't listen to in the first place, or just leave it in hopes that it'll "click" one day
>>69643848
Mine leans more towards 3.5/4.0 which is still pretty topheavy but idk your rating system seems pretty inflated. If you have over a hundred 10/10s you're doing it wrong imo.
>>69644930
gloomy and carrie
>>69644871
Link? Also, why are there no 5's?
>>69645055
that's right, memorize it now
yawn
>>69643848
why would you flesh out how much you dislike things rather than how much you like them?
reminder that if your rates have no weight you should delete your account
>>69645173
https://rateyourmusic.com/~no_comment
There are no 10/10 albums
You wish you had these curves.
>>69642883
>>69642915
>>69643848
Fucking stop.
>>69641942
classic
how do you guys rate your albums? (the ones you listened to more than a couple of times) do you go with your heart tells you, or do you rate track by thrack and take the average?
>>69645459
>GrimesCuck
fucking stop
>>69644871
>>69642031
>>69641971
very nice
>>69645494
albums are often significantly lesser or greater than the sum of their parts
a mean 3.0 means you are not very good at finding music
>>69645531
according to
>>69645495
:^)
>peak at anything but 2.5
>>69645607
nice random namedropping
look at this shit that just happened to me
>>69645634
you too
>>69645494
I usually rate tracks as I go along at the same time that I come up with an overall rating based on feel. If they're different, I average the two.
>>69645643
who?
>>69645643
Get on my level.
>>69645440
There are 10/10 albums because music is subjective.
>>69645683
>worst trip likes the second worst trip
kek
>>69645683
Holy fuck.
which one's worse
>>69645440
>not enjoying a single album all the way through
>>69645511
>>69645505
nice.
>>69645727
>>69645728
>>69645772
There are many albums that can be enjoyed all the way through, but the level of enjoyment isnt high enough to warrant 10/10
>>69645440
Nice comfy-core list
>>69641881
>>69641942
>>69641984
>>69642883
>>69642915
>>69643848
>>69643857
>>69645287
>>69645416
>>69645494
autism
>>69641971
>>69642031
>>69643597
>>69644871
>>69645205
>>69645459
>>69645505
>>69645511
>>69645800
intelligent well brought up individuals
>>69646140
boring taste
yeah... haha
>>69645592
:^) is a shit tier reddit meme and defense mechanism
>>69646872
What are your top 6?
Music is bad and you should feel bad for liking it
>>69647061
stratosphere
public strain
telstar drugs
long season
98.12.28
loveless
>>69648918
Kek
>>69641881
such a plebby curve
>>69649850
sorry
>>69650346
thx for playin!!!!
>>69648320
aw :( i am glad i am not you. music can be fun!
>>69651493
profile ?
>>69650346
All that work for a troll account. That's dedication.
>>69651526
be gentle, friendo. btw, I didn't *just* listen to F#A#, just decided to review the CD version. *Did* just listen to Low, however :-)
https://rateyourmusic.com/~Listening_Louser