ITT: albums with god tier cover art

Is that Flying Saucer Attack?

>>69598941
yeah, their s/t

File: image.jpg (45KB, 355x355px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 355x355px

>>69598926

File: 41BYVpV9WRL.jpg (17KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 500x500px

inb4
>Pearl Jam

>>69599089
>Pearl Jam

>>69599099
I FUCKING INB4'D YOU FAGGOT

File: panda-bear-person-pitch.jpg (4MB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1500x1500px

>>69599072
nah man all their covers are puke, especially OKC

>>69599089
that's a shitty cover and you can't inb4 your own post

File: Liftyrskinnyfists.jpg (151KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 500x500px

>>69599157
good choice

File: Fragile.jpg (88KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 300x300px

Almost all of Yes' album art fits.

File: IMG_1104.jpg (31KB, 220x214px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 220x214px

Perfect colors, contrast, and imagery for the next 45 minutes of music

File: MyBloodyValentineLoveless.jpg (67KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 300x300px

I think what defines a good album cover is one that is an accurate visual representation of the sound of the album. By that criteria, a lot of the ones in this thread are not good at all. Of course visual art is a subjective medium so I won't diss anyone's taste - if you for some reason like the way it looks that itself makes it a good album cover to some degree.
Pic related, whether you love the album or hate it, is a very good cover.
Some of my other favourites would be Boris - Flood, Black Flag - Damaged, Butthole Surfers - Psychic... Powerless and CAN - Soon Over Babaluma.
Hopefully people will find this post thought-provoking yet inoffensive.

>>69599683
I agree with this.

By this criteria, Magical Mystery Tour has good art though, so idk if this is always true.

>>69599683
you have bad taste in music and visual art

>>69599801
ok bro im sorry for posting on your board

>>69598926
>>69599858

>>69598926
Do you actually like that artwork? Why?

>>69599966
why do you not like it?

>>69600062
It looks like a photo taken on a flip phone at twilight.

>>69600137
correct

>>69600098
Except the cover is from 1993 you mong

>>69600098
idk, guess im just a sucker for sunsets. fits the album really well too

>>69600183
Did they not have flip phones back then?

>>69600183
I was talking about the quality, not what it actually is, you mong.

>>69600213
It's a very grainy, low quality picture that fits the aesthetic of the album.

>>69599683
Thanks for posting this, you're quite right

>>69600235
so it's shitty quality?

>>69600203
no you fucking retard

Half of Herbie's albums.

>>69600274
its lo-fi

>>69598926
this cover sucks and this album is shit

File: ManChild.jpg (31KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 340x340px

>>69600311
Forgot the picture but whatever

I haven't even heard this but I love the artwork

File: 4294467.jpg (68KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 500x500px

>>69600374
fuck here it is

>>69600318
that's what they all say

>>69600335
die

>>69599089
Bad cover. Bad band.

File: Babyfather-419.jpg (142KB, 800x808px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 800x808px

>>69598926
>>69599157
>>69599683
>>69600137
Word up.

File: 1987326.jpg (43KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x600px

Pic related might just be the best ever.

>>69598926
Alt cover was better.
>>69599970
Hell yeah.
>>69600315
Shit album. God tier cover art.