Jewel cases or digipaks?

Jewel cases ftw. Digipaks are too expensive.

>>69464074
digipaks cause they are actually worth being paid for
why would you even want to buy a shitty jewelcase like thousands with some fucking paper and cd

Jewel cases. You can replace them, unlike Digipaks which you can't replace if they get fucked somehow.

I like digipaks more since it feels more like buying a record. Jewel cases are just kind of boring.

>>69464074
Jewel cases, because I can print out all album covers, tracklisting, everything I need to put over it so it looks like the real thing then place a homemade CD of the album inside & pretend I actually own the album.

>>69464074
Jewel cases because they're easy to replace, if something happens to a digipack it's fucked forever. Also some digipacks have a slipcase style that scratches the disc up something fierce. The worst offender I've ever seen is Lift Your Skinny Fists, the discs cannot be removed without fucking them up in the process.

I don't care as long as I get the music on the CD they hold.

Jewel cases because they're more sturdy and they're all made the same which makes it easier to organize.

Heavy duty cardboard slips.

Jewel cases > Digipaks > Actual dogshit > Mini-LP sleeves

both have their pros and cons and i don't personally prefer either, but imagine if vinyl records had a massive fucking jewel casing and cassettes had digipack -style casing

just some food for thought

>>69464074
Digipaks, they feel like something worth owning physically and are easier to store

Jewels for the shelf at home, nylon CD binder for travel