WTF she's like patrician version of Grimes!!!

they dont even make similar music

>>69449473
I know right?

It's like the music that Grimes would be making if she was an actual talented artist.

>>69449441
yeah exactly

I'll admit she's got a good voice and her lyrics have alittle bit more depth and meaning than the average pop star, she also seems like a very genuine and grounded person.
But the instrumentation and her producers don't work well with her voice whatsoever. She needs to drop all the stupid production and make simple folk music.
The tracks I remember the best are with much more simpler production and instrumentation. Too many synths and shit (more layed back poetry and calmer songs, rather than hyped up popstar production you can find anywhere in "indie pop")

But I suppose, she does have to fit in and get popular with normies somehow.

>>69449441
>short ultralight hair
MUH DICKUUU!

her music is bad. her lyrics are bad. i love pop music, but i can't see literally anything special about her. i went in expecting to really like her album this year and i was really disappointed and will continue to listen to suzanne sundfor who does everything aurora does but well

>>69449441
Stop being so delusional. Now every female artist is compared with the quality standard Grimes?

>>69451039
They're desperately trying to undermine how great of an artist Grimes is. It's okay. Just let them.

just looked her up

i dag it

who

>>69451068
That only proves that she's actually important if so many compare random artists to her.

>>69449441
sounds like a budget florence