>pitchfork gives 20 year old universally loved album a 9.1

>>69434150
Which album?

File: 1479087165736.jpg (27KB, 639x475px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 639x475px

>>69434150

>tfw P4K gives an unremarkable but "hip" young rap artist an 8.7

File: 1476652272678.jpg (45KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x600px

>>69434150
>p4k gives a 40 year old album, commonly called the greatest of all time a 7.5 because it sounds "dated"
I shouldn't even have to say it

>>69434171
J Cole?
>>69434150
Soundtracks for the Blind?
>>69434186
I have no fucking clue

File: image.jpg (51KB, 429x587px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 429x587px

>>69434150
>pitchfork gives a 2016 meme rap album which by all accounts should be a 2.4 in the grand scheme of things

File: 1475904088873.png (307KB, 843x622px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 843x622px

>>69434211
Pet Sounds

>unironically going on the worst music review site on the internet

>>69434222
album 9+*

Why does Pitchfork even bother critiquing hip hop?

They never have been and never will be an authority on the subject

>>69434186
I can't find a single fucking picture of him doing that face but for whatever reason that pepe looks like Mark Mothersbaugh.
>>69434229
Pet Sounds is 50 years old not 40

>>69434246
The review was from 1999 so I should have said 33 years old sorry

File: 1474164771633.jpg (84KB, 700x714px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 700x714px

>P4k gives shitty, mentally ill "rapper" a 10, then a 9.5, then a 9.0, cemented their place as the most crooked music publication of all time

>>69434263
Damn, alright
We both got it wrong then

>>69434242
might as well stop reviewing music in general if you think they're authoritative about any genre.

>>69434246
His face in general just looks sort of like that