Is KKB J-Pop?

yea but at the same time it's not
it needs a new name
kkb-pop

spampop
viralmarketpop
forcedpop
shillpop
pick one

>>69426960

I literally haven't been on 4chan in months but okay

J-Pop fans whining because an artist is too popular to be considered J-pop. You guys are seriously bad people.

>>69427007
this is weird, I was actually expecting you to admit being a shill for that generic cute girl-fronted synthpop band
now I don't know what to say

No. She is British. This shit is as cringy as when white people say they're Cherokee.

>>69426960
fucking this

stop spamming this shit tedyandreasfag

>>69427136

But she's half-japanese and fluent in Japanese and sings in japanese half the time. So it's...half J Pop? Fug I'm so confused

>>69427229
she's 1/3 of the band
they live in england
all their music was recorded and produced in the uk
it's ok that your band want to target the jpop crowd but they will not welcome you
your gimmick won't last long

their lyrics are cringey af

https://youtu.be/la9C0n7jSsI

thoughts on this remix?

>>69426928
Yep, because it's stylistically J-Pop. There's a reason why we don't call every pop group in or from japan a J-Pop group.

>>69427709

dope af

>>69426928
any more pictures of her feet????

>>69429034
ugh

>>69430905
fuck you dickhead

I knew you would falseflag bump before it fell off the page

>>69430960
I'm someone else. I just like scrolling /mu/ bottom-up to save anything I want to comment on that might die.

I don't think people are really shilling this, they're just waifuing because people are obsessed with Japan and the singer is cute.

>>69431002
you aren't fooling anyone with these

>>69429034
>>69430905

low effort

File: differentfag.png (64KB, 1579x773px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1579x773px

>>69431027
I posted >>69430905 but nothing else.

>>69431065
Anyone can falsify these things easily. Proves nothing.

>>69431116
That's true, but I wouldn't bother to over something so petty.

>>69426928

feet arent as good as i would have thought, disappointing

>>69431175
yet you bump a dead thread with a fake post