scaruffi will give it a 0

>implying he can be bothered to review it

>implying Scaruffi's opinion on anything is valid

>>69333653
of course he can you dummy
he reviewed everything she made in the past

>>69333646
the lowest score he can give to it is 4, but he'll probably give it a 5.5 or 6 (see MPP)

>>69333761
0

>>69333646
Christgau gave it an A:
>Generally the soprano signifies purity, which has never been my idea of virtue, not to mention fun. And given how hard it is to achieve, there can be a vanity to it as well—or in earlier Claire Boucher, a self-regarding freakishness. But on this pop-yet-not breakthrough, that pretension is blown away by generous tunes, changeable grooves, and dedicated intensity of purpose. This singer-composer-producer is neither cute nor ethereal, and although the consistency of her register is an affectation by definition, she'll convince anyone who isn't a grouch that she's just being herself, not merely female but, fuck you, feminine—the fairie she likes to claim crossed with a charming three-year-old getting what she wants. Which includes adrenaline highs and mitigated perversity and California love and pornography in phonetic Chinese. She embodies hyperfeminist individualism for a post-rock mindset that likes a good beat fine. A

https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/robert-christgau-grimes-sophie

If an old old fart rock critic like Christgau was impressed by Art Angels, you could say without a shadow of a doubt that this album rocks. And by the way, Christgau > Scaruffi.

>>69333646
Probably 4, imo.

We'll have to wait ages anyway, he still hasn't even listened to Divers.

>>69333887
>the same nigga who cant into king crimson gave grimes an a
holy hell

>>69333676
>>69333769
>>69334025
>>69333903
>hater(s)

>>69333887
didn't he give jason derulo an A ALSO?

>>69333761
Absolute horse shit

>>69334206
?

>>69334237
He's rated albums 2 and 3 before

>>69334259
where did I say that he didn't?

geidi primes contrarians exist who knew

File: IMG_5016.jpg (65KB, 750x429px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 750x429px

>>69334277
>the lowest score he can give is 4

kek, now BTFO

>>69334494
nice changing of my words faggot

>>69334494
Thats not exactly what he said.

>>69334509
You literally said that retard

faggot faggot faggot +1 post count

>>69334518
i said:
>the lowest score he can give to it is 4

you rephrased:
>the lowest score he can give is 4

how can you be so autistic?

>>69334509
Ok then you picky faggot

>>69333761
>the lowest score he can give to it is 4

False, he could give a two and a three to it.

File: IMG_5067.jpg (43KB, 450x273px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 450x273px

>>69334545

>>69334547
>False, he could give a two and a three to it.

I don't think so
see MPP

File: IMG_4895.jpg (9KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 183x275px

>>69334545
>implying he can only give the album a 4 and higher

>>69334579
stop rephrasing my words, that's not what I implied and you know it since I already said that

>>69334579
>a retard

>>69334564
And what? He can still give the album a fucking 3/10

>>69334604
of course he can, but it's not likely

>>69334590
>>69334596
Samefag

Also you literally said the lowest score he can give to it is 4, which is just plain wrong

not BTFO with your
>stop rephrasing cause it's implying I meant this
Bullshit

File: Screenshot_2016-11-28-21-13-35.png (254KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 1080x1920px

>>69334640
>samefag
lol

I got bored of your average baits
hoped you was going to make something spicy
acting like you can't read is 14 y.o. level

>>69334690
But you were wrong, the fucks up with you?
>the lowest score he can give to it is 4
This is false. Now fuck off faggot

@69334719
>>69334611

>>69334734
Oh, I see now. You realised your statement was wrong so you commented contradicting yourself to show you can change your mind?

>>69334206
>>69334259
>>69334494
>>69334518
>>69334640
>>69334719
http://www.wikihow.com/Calm-Down-an-Autistic-Person

>>69334611
>The lowest score he can give to it is 4
>>69334611
>of course he can, but it's not likely

If this is the same OP, you're fighting a losing battle my friend

File: IMG_5065.jpg (105KB, 602x709px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 602x709px

>>69334761
>I'm wrong so I'll just resort to calling him autistic

i think he would not review it and pretend it doesn't exist

>>69334782
kek

>>69334782
kuk

>>69334782
Top lel

>>69334775
>>>69334690
>still didn't figure out that it's different posters

your kinda dumb, aren't you?

>>69334821
So your statement still stands about "the lowest score he can give to it is 4"?

>>69334844
I'm the one who wrote the second one
now calm down and accept the truth

>>69334782
this guys winning atm with this post alone, keep going guys!

>>69334856
What truth? I agree with this:
>>69334611

But not with this:
>>69333761
because it's just straight up wrong

>>69334879
the one you agree with is the truth and it's obv the second one if we came from this >>69334775

>>69334782
You suffer from not being able to understand that statements are sometimes not always 100% literal. A very common autistic trait.
If someone told you they "need a beer right now or they'll literally die", "he'll NEVER rate an album such and such" or "he wouldn't ever do that" I'd imagine you'd fail to read very far into those statements and just hear it as literal.
If not, you're just getting mad at nothing and I'm just overthinking your retarded posts.

What the fuck is wrong with you people? When you see Grimes posted you started to behave like retards. Why?

>>69333887
Christgau really is one of the worst music critics.

File: image.jpg (113KB, 582x607px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 582x607px

the eternal BTFOer

>>69335612
Ariel pink called her stupid and retarded

i hope she lands that meme review

>>69333646
Well, it's really not that good. Maybe not 0 material though.