Will having an extension on the USB cable reduce quality?

>>69294723
i did it before but i didn't notice any difference, there probably isnt, and even if im wrong you can barely tell the difference

>>69294723
If you are recording with some shitty $100 condenser it really doesn't matter that you have a USB extension in your sound chain

>>69294854
I'm not really recording and have no idea what a condenser is

>>69294871
You don't know what a condenser is, okay. Denser tho, that's you

>>69294871
What are you doing then?

>>69294944
Just listening pleasure.

I'm going to play around with some sounds for but it's by no means a priority.

>>69294962
Well I guess giving you your answer is by no means a priority

>>69294723
Anything it could do is to introduce bigger input lag. It's fucking digital interface, how it could reduce qulaity, you dumbo?

>>69294937
This would be a good time to educate someone with similar interests rather than be a condescending asshole

Your music is shit and will never make it anywhere, at least enjoy discussing your hobby with like-minded people

>>69294871
>>69294854

Don't pay attention to this asshole. He's one of the poor misguided souls that think better gear will save their garbage music.

>>69295866
Post your music

>>69295803
>Anything it could do is to introduce bigger input lag
>light speed

>>69295979
Post your penis

>>69295979

post your penis.


and i could post stuff by will toledo, phil elvrum, have a nice life, daniel johnston etc that would still prove my point.

so post your penis.

>>69295999
Error: Comment too long (14546373847362849382637393/2000)

>>69296023
>and i could post stuff by will toledo, phil elvrum, have a nice life, daniel johnston
Posting more garbage music won't help your point.

>>69295994
>light speed
explain yourself, Einstein
(3 m)/(1x10^8 m/s) = 3x10^-8 s is still noticable

>>69296043

anything recorded before 1980 was worse quality than OP's gear. Are you saying there's no good music before 1980?

>>69296090
Are you saying Neumann U47s and Neve 8070s are worse?

You are not smart.

File: 287617-9164cc844ceb47817054cf5f1b907e5b.jpg (68KB, 884x800px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 884x800px

>>69296057

>>69296140
Your green t-shirt is pretty effay

>>69294723
No. It's a binary signal. If it starts to get affected by noise, the device won't work at all. There's no middle ground of "reduced quality."

>>69296151
>booooom

>>69296090
Why even listen to music that was made before year you was born?

>>69296138

ok not anything, but the VAST majority of recording gear was inferior to the average consumer grade shit today.

>>69294871
>have no idea what a condenser is
burger education

>>69296207
Not really. are you the guy who didn't know what a condenser was?

You sound like him.

>>69296256

no im not