Anybody have this turntable? If so, what are your thoughts on

>>69280373
Anything under $200 is trash

>>69280373
It's absolute garbage, what do you expect from a $35 dollar turntable? It will literally destroy your records

>>69280373
Sadly, cheap turntables aren't worth buying at all. It will sound horrible, they weight of the tonearm is bad for your records, it will break down within a few months. You have to spend money and get a quality turntable or buy a decent used one from the 70s.

>>69280373
...Shit I think that's the one I use...

I have a slightly different one hang on.

dont use it on and records you don't want to destroy

File: LowQuality.jpg (34KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x500px

>TFW I've had a shitty record player this whole time and I didn't know until this thread existed.

I got it as a gift. I didn't know it was bad for records.

Shit.

crosley gets a lot of shit for awful turntables, and while I agree that they're terrible, Jensen makes just as bad if not worse turntables

>>69280565

They're all the same shit though, the turntable components come from the same Chinese manufacturer (Hanpin? I don't remember the name).

Get a used Technics or something.
You should never buy a turntable that costs as much as a single record new.

so whats the best turntable for the lowest price?

>>69280686
What does that even mean

>>69280686

U-Turn Orbit, AT-LP120, Pro-Ject Debut. These are the entry-level good ones. You can't find anything else new cheaper than those. Unless you go for vintage ones.

>>69280718
I'm guessing he's asking for a cheap turntable that won't fuck up your records.