Holy fuck, why do they sound so fucking bad in stereo? This is

>any 60s album
>good in stereo

LE SIGH, WHY DO LE HATERS HATE BEATLES? IT'S NOT FAIR HOW MUCH THEY ARE HATED BY BOTH CONTRARIANS AND NORMIES ALIKE :((((( FUCK YOU OP, FUCK YOU!!!!

Early stereo was an afterthought.

>>69266495
I blame jews.

>>69266495
T H E
H
E

1. It was designed for speakers
2. They wanted to show the individual instruments
3. They were high on crack

>>69266705
the jews or the beatles?

>>69266520
pet sounds is objectively better in stereo
as well as plenty of albums from the tail end of the decade

>>69266729
whats the difference?

>>69266740
Brian Wilson learned his recording from Phil Spector, who famously mixed in mono. Is there a mono version of Pet Sounds that came first or something?

>>69266776
i am not sure what is being asked of ?

>>69266776
Yes there is a mono version. And it's the best version.

File: 1479627408812.png (260KB, 326x326px)

260KB, 326x326px

>Beatles
>Implying they're better in mono
>Implying they're good at all

File: The Fact That.png (933KB, 1065x819px) Image search: [Google]

933KB, 1065x819px

>>69266618

>>69266495
A Hard Day's Night wasn't a bad stereo mix.

>>69266495
DUDE HARD PANNING LMAO

>>69267569
>the dude on the left side
it's like he wasn't even trying

Is it really worth tracking down the mono versions?
Not really sure where I got mine but as they are all digital I can't tell if they're mono or sterero.