Bring Back mutracker Thread #2

just don't have forums this time

>>69247961
>>69247979
and only let people in that can spot a transcode

>>69247979
why not?

>>69248037
this i can get behind

Keep /mu/tants from overtaking the entire tracker, or at least let a lot of people from outside of /mu/ in it
/mu/ doesn't deserve mutracker but we definitely need it

And make a stricter ratio and stricter rules for uploads and accepted formats, and encourage more use of the catalog numbers and labels, bitrates don't need to be as strict as what.cd was but at least allow for less uncertainty in where the files are coming from

important 4th bump

Yes pls

important 5th bump

Important 6th bump

Important 7th Bump

Important 8th bump

Jesus you guys fucking help me out here

I don't give a shit if you don't want to my needs are more important than your stupid fucking shit fucking listen to me and do what I'm telling you to do as you should

>>69250685

Dude it's midnight in America, everyone who can help is sleeping

>>69250741
I know and I'm so fucking tired

Why exactly did it fail other than people didn't need it? And why would a revival work?

Hey don't bring back mutracker

>>69251819
>And why would a revival work?
Personally I'd use the shit out of a private tracker like what.cd was, but if it can be revived in a way so that it isn't ran awfully or if /mu/ doesn't ruin it then I can't see how it'd be bad so long as there are sufficient enough resources for it to run
If you want to know why it failed I think they explain that some in the statement left over at the site's original url at mutracker.org

>>69251970
>mutracker.org
We may be back soon. Stay tuned.

>>69247979
dumb idea

File: 1467497856217.png (72KB, 210x210px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 210x210px

>>69252144
oh fuck

File: 1468904955726.jpg (220KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1000x1000px

>>69252144
ITS
H A P P E N I N G

File: 1438744427953.png (352KB, 471x457px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 471x457px

>>69252144

>>69251970
Why did mutracker fail?

I understand that it was a secondary tracker for most people but was their any major reason why it failed?

r.i.p xern0n's mini fridge

>>69252891
that reason yeah
the hype of it existing was greater than that of actually using it I guess

>>69252891
Too many 4chan plebs. No one likes to hang out with you lepers.

File: boysdontcrysesowjuly212013.jpg (498KB, 568x756px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 568x756px

>>69252144

>>69252163
at least not the random forum. Stupid cancer

We're working very intensively to develop the logo.

>>69253204
interesting, I like the old one so hope it ends up nicer

>>69253117
Yeah that one was aids. The others were ok

File: 1462058863648.jpg (6KB, 191x234px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 191x234px

>>69252144

File: 12.jpg (175KB, 620x875px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 620x875px

>mutracker

poor man's libble, even. sad!

yo count me in

add an option to change every name to Anonymous

>>69252144
happening.jpg