What are the chances that people in the 2080s and 2090s will still be giving at least tiny little fuck about any music released in the 00s and 10s?
Including the ones that will still be alive from now?
>>69161975
The average 25 years old, let's say.
>>69162067
Maybe the same percentage that we have of people how listen to music from 1900~1910?
>>69162162
Now I'm depressed.
>>69162222
nice quads, but couldnt someone from the 1900s be just as sad? do you listen to 1900s music and expect others to?
>>69162162
Probably more than that. There aren't a lot of recordings from the 1910s and few there are aren't exactly great quality wise.
I mean in 1910 music was just invented.
>>69162162
not equivalent at all
>>69162162
Elgar was cool
>>69162479
>Implying music hasn't been around before then
2010 music started
>>69162479
Maybe people in the future will say the same about our generation music.
by then we'll be able to literally become music of nowadays by a computer--inside we can pick like we can literally BECOME a vaporwave album
>>69162767
They really won't. Anything pre-40s is pretty difficult to listen to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkjqEX_D9-Y
D U C C
>>69162712
no, music was invented in 1910
>>69162841
They really will. Mostly anything 10s is pretty difficult to listen to.
>>69161941
I like to imagine that /mu/ will still be around but we're all just bitter old men shitposting about the cultural significance of meme rap
>>69162947
YUNG LEAN BOIS
>>69162767
Not really, there is a clear difference from 1910s recordings and 2010s recordings. Sure audio quality will improve but 1910s recordings are barely listenable a lot of the time while 2010s recordings are audible.
>>69162479
There aren't a lot of direct brain-sensations from the 2010's, I mean in 2016 you actually had to listen to a composition to experience feelings.
100%
This is why.