[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Let's just all admit that this is album is bad

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 32
Thread images: 5

>awful production
>mediocre singing
>poor instrumentalism
>decent compositions
>faux-sincere, nonsensical lyrics
The best thing about this album is the cover.
>>
>>68900934
>awful production
I like the way it sounds
>mediocre singing
I like the way it sounds
>poor instrumentalism
yeah
>decent compositions
yeah
>faux-sincere, nonsensical lyrics
how do you know what's faux-sincere and what's real sincere
>>
>>68900934
>poor instrumentalism
explain this
>>
>>68900934
oh yes you convinced me i no longer enjoy this album
fucking contrarians
>>
>>68900934
listen to it again but without thinking of it as a meme
>>
>>68900934
>OK Guys, I don't like this so neither can you.


Suck my dick nigga imma listen to it rn just to spite your nappy ass
>>
File: 1449364892433.png (161KB, 271x222px)
1449364892433.png
161KB, 271x222px
>instrumentalism
>>
>>68901041
Yeah, instrumentalism. What about it?
>>
>>68900934
Technically it's a bad album, yes. But it's part of the modern trend of finding value in "surrealist/abstract" i.e. Pretentiously weird or shitty, on "purpose". Not that most /mu/ browsers know this, so this post won't get anywhere except triggered responses.
>>
>>68901084
>purpose in quotations
loving every laugh, good b8
>>
>>68901072
if you mean the use of instruments it's instrumentation
>>
>>68901110
Wrong. Instrumentalism is also acceptable. Look it up.
>>
>>68901097
The fact you think that's bait means youre horribly behind on basic knowledge in cultural trends and you really should leave

>inb4 you think you're cool and off-beat for not knowing
>>
>>68901142
but it's not correct, instrumentation is the correct phrase

saying instrumentalism in place of instrumentation is just a perversion of the english language
>>
>>68900934
It has a nice feeling to it, that it succeeds to deliver, at least to me.

$3.50 says you're a prog-fan.
>>
>>68901319
>01319▶
>>>68900934 (OP)
>It has a nice feeling to it, that it succeeds to deliver, at least to me.
>$3.50 says you're a prog-fan.
You just lost $3.50, guy.
>>
>>68900934
I'm an oldfag and this is one of the greatest albums since I was born in the 80s. I can understand why someone wouldn't like this upon first listening to it, but if it doesn't grow on you after awhile, then I sincerely discredit your opinion in music. In my everyday life, I am by no means some sort of music "patrician" that goes around and judges people by their music, but if someone were to come up to me and tell me they listened to this album a bunch of times and just hated it still, I would feel sorry for them more than anything else.

Having said that, I think everything Radiohead is boring so most here would consider me a "pleb". Oh well.
>>
>>68901267
the english language is a perversion
>>
>>68900963
I LOVE YOU JESUS CHRIIIIST
>>
File: 1478150453548s.jpg (10KB, 224x250px) Image search: [Google]
1478150453548s.jpg
10KB, 224x250px
>>68900934
>>
>>68900934

>awful production

guitar has never sounded better than it does on the first seconds of King of Carrot Flowers
>>
OP's post gave me intense 08-09 nostalgia
>>
File: IMG_20161102_034102.jpg (73KB, 544x529px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20161102_034102.jpg
73KB, 544x529px
>>68901791
>I am by no means some sort of music "patrician" that goes around and judges people by their music

>if it doesn't grow on you after awhile, then I sincerely discredit your opinion in music

Really made me think.
>>
jesus christ you guys suck
>>
>>68901084
>But it's part of the modern trend of finding value in "surrealist/abstract" i.e. Pretentiously weird or shitty, on "purpose".

Dude what the fuck
What is with people like you who INSIST that Modernist or Experimental art is insincere and obnoxious and primarily intent on asserting the superiority or intelligence of the artist/audience

guess what doofus
some people just like this shit
some people take delight in sensory experiences vast and varied
and ask not for every rational appeal to their irrationality to be executed with the utmost of technical ability and formalism

you have to realize the inherent failure to reason that occurs within the implication that everybody who enjoys "surrealist/abstract" (two terms you completely misused btw) art is simply faking their enjoyment of the art

some people value different types of experiences then you do
some people value the sound of this man's voice for the emotion and manner and character it conveys
some people are more concerned with it being diretly harmonious then they are in those things

suck my dick

>>68901267
>perversion of the english language
couldnt the same be said of your failure to capitalize or puncuate

or your calling "instrumentation" a phrase when it is in fact a word

language is a constantly evolving fluid and subjective thing that is created and determined by man. words mean what everyone thinks they mean, deal w it homeboy
>>
File: 1477747618550.png (385KB, 610x663px) Image search: [Google]
1477747618550.png
385KB, 610x663px
>>68902149
>Modernist or Experimental art is insincere and obnoxious and primarily intent on asserting the superiority or intelligence of the artist/audience
>you have to realize the inherent failure to reason that occurs within the implication that everybody who enjoys "surrealist/abstract" (two terms you completely misused btw) art is simply faking their enjoyment of the art

Never said that, or implied it either. Anyway, it is very much part of postmodernism, and so are you. Seems you dont have enough self awareness to acknowledge it, though.
>>
>>68901142
>Look it up
>literally every hit proves him wrong
Don't use terms you know nothing about
>>
>>68900934
im a fan of skepticism but being a blind contrarian DOESNT make you look smart (or whatever the fuck you were going for)
>>
meme
>>
>>68900934
are you autistic
people like the album because emotions
>>
>>68901142
hahaa you're a fucking nerd bro honestly get fucked
>>
>>68900934
is that a potato?
Thread posts: 32
Thread images: 5


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.