Do you believe Paul McCartney died and was replaced?

>>68856457
>>>/x/

>>68856457
Wow, two photos of the exact same person

It was a dumb as fuck theory in the 60's and it still is.

The chances of finding a guy to replace him that not only looked exactly like him, but sounded exactly like him, had the same ridiculous vocal range, the same ability as an instrumentalist, and the same incredible knack for songwriting/melody is essentially impossible.

File: paul mccartney.jpg (51KB, 616x478px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 616x478px

>where were you?

the false paul has been so much more time paul than the real paul then, it would matter anymore?

quick thought

smoking weed makes your face look retarded and puffy. He also seemed to have thinned out his eyebrows, and his jawline is coming through more noticeably on the right, probably lost some weight.

it's the same person

>>68857303
err meant to reply in this post to >>68856972

>>68856457
What upsets me a little is how amazing of a musician and songwriter McCartney is, and these bullshit threads are the only ones that get consistenly bumped on mu.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAnNgCsNMnk

this

>implying that false paul isn't better than real paul

>>68858038
>the fake Paul made Sgt Peppers, The White Album, MMT, etc.

>>68857303
im aware. i don't buy into the thing, i just find it amusing.