Is this enough to get started in music production?

ye probably

but no one except losers use cubase btw

if ur into beats, go fl
if ur into edm/experimental go ableton
if u actually wannago pro go protools

>>68811843
I tested trials of the most important DAWS, and I actually realised that Cubase is the best one to deal with MIDI.

>ableton
kek.

>>68811843
fuck off bitch. cubase da bess
>tfw i cant find my cubase USB key
;_; where the fuck did i leave it.

>>68811871
>I actually realised that Cubase is the best one to deal with MIDI.

lol

>>68811810
No, start with Audacity

>not using logic

>>68811973
It's relatively cheap, and lo lots of things.
It's the only daw I've ever used, but I love it

>>68811810
Depends what you want to do, but generally any known daw is enough to start, flux pavilion uses it, if you like it don't let others change your mind to use other stuff
I personally use logic pro x and love it, but to everyone his own
here's some of my stuff, I have a more or less house ep i'm putting out in a couple of weeks, will post the link here
https://soundcloud.com/fowlrest

>>68811973
I don't own an Apple computer.

Thinking about switching from ableton to reason because it seems to be more suited to working with samples

Any thoughts?

>>68812168
I was told that ableton is really flexible, especially for samples since lots of ideas come from mpcs,
you could rewire reason in ableton tho, that'd be rad

>>68811810
It might make it harder for you depending on what genre of music you produce.

I make mostly electro music, but I started first almost 10 years ago with Cubase 5.

You can totally start with it, don't forget famous VSTs instruments to help you.

At this day I don't think I would ever switch from Cubase unless I would be forced to. Cubase is really powerful if you are patient and will get you far. But if you want to be EDM champion, maybe other products will get you started faster.

only plebs use DAW's

Hardware is best

tr-303
tr-909
moog
korg mx
microkorg
Grand piano
violin
speak and spell

>>68812427
I can't afford that, bro.

>>68811931
It's true. I've always found Cubase to be pretty flexible with MIDI.
It's a good all-round DAW in fact, if you're dealing with both recorded audio and MIDI it's equally strong with both imo, compared to say Pro Tools or Ableton which are more specialised to their respective areas.
But ultimately it's all down to workflow preference anyway.

>>68811843
If you actually had anything in common with sound engineering you would know that cubase (also nuendo) are commonly used. Of course pro tools is far more popular but there isnt a big difference between them both except that pro tools design makes it look more "proffesional"

test