Is picrel right or wrong?

>Pitchfork
0-6 bad
6-7.5 good
7.5-8.5 very good
8.5-10 overrated crap

>>68590870
It's wrong.

Scruffi looks okay
P4k 5.5's are considered pretty bad pans, so that one needs some adjusting.
Fantano's "insanely good" should strtch to light 9, and adjust from there.

Christgau is good. btw he is the best critic here

File: text5314.png (154KB, 1900x1450px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1900x1450px

changed

>>68591183
Remove insanely good from Fantano
10 and 9: very good
8 and 7: good
6 and 5: okay
You know the rest
If you insist on adding insanely good, keep it only at 10 and move everything else one row down

File: text5315.png (153KB, 1900x1450px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1900x1450px

updated

>>68591038
Christgau is the only critic there

reminder pitchfork is written by 13 year olds

Pretty accurate. I'm pretty sure 7.5 is the cutoff for very good in the case of Scaruffi though.

File: IMG_6261.jpg (1MB, 2419x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2419x3264px

>he cares about music critics

why don't you trust yourself

>>68590870
>picrel

I hate you and I don't even know you

>>68592795
christgau is a fucking edgelord

>>68593221
It's actually 7

>>68592336
Change very good from 9 to 8 and everything else one step below in the case of Fantano
Also, very good starts at 7 with Scaruffi

>>68593283
>he doesn't stand on the shoulder of giants
Have fun reinventing the wheel while I'm flying an airplane

>>68593344
he's the absolute madman

File: mem.png (153KB, 1900x1450px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1900x1450px

>>68590870
scores less than 2 don't exist on the scaruffi scale, so it's more like this

>>68592795
What did Christgau give ITAOTS?

File: IMG_20161021_180827.jpg (85KB, 1440x686px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1440x686px

>>68594145
Sad faces

>>68594176
So what you're trying to tell me is he's another self-important, contrarian critic with shit taste in music?

>>68593835
scaruffi and christgau are the only giants (in the sense that they've heard and written about thousands of artists over a period of decades and have amassed a ton of relevant knowledge and experience)

pitchfork is made up of hack journalists who have probably heard less music than you and i

fantano's only above-average quality is charisma and speaking skills

>>68594232
Yes, he's just a regular music listener

>>68594252
Yeah, I never intended to imply I cared for Fantano or Pitchfork. I heard Pitchfork were good at its beginnings, but I wouldn't even bother if that. Scaruffi is the only one on the list I would consider truly worthwhile. Christgau is just a dad rocker with extensive knowledge.

File: Fantano - Scaruffi - Christgau - Pitchfork.jpg (2MB, 1532x4921px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1532x4921px

Might as well combine the two images.

>>68593835
>he doesn't stand on the shoulder of giants
>Have fun reinventing the wheel while I'm flying an airplane
this is the most retarded post I've ever seen. please tell me you don't actually believe this

Christgau should have for the lower ratings "unrated" as he just rates that shit based on "the people who listen that reminded me of the jocks that bullied me in highschool" and stupid edgelord bullshit.

>>68594827
scaruffi is clearly the only one who doesn't rate based on muh feels

>>68592795
Actual critics don't rate in emoticons of bombs.

>>68594827
>tfw Loveless is the highest ranking album across the board

>>68590870
>Christgau's A's
>Not random shit or shit he shills for
Oh my fucking God, so madonna and Backstreer boys shit are insanely good now?

>>68594827
Fantano gives MPP a 9/10

>>68590870
In most peoples perception
0 - 9= good.
8=Ok.
7 - 0 = Bad

>>68596713
no, tvu&n is

>>68595689
?

>>68595689
dude, he's the Avant-Math god of /mu/! please join him on his quest to climb his way to the shoulders of giants, and launch avant-math-mu.com!