Post your RYM Rating names

5.0
4.5 transcendental
4.0 godlike
3.5 legendary
3.0 classic
2.5 great
2.0 good
1.5 decent
1.0 average
0.5 bad

File: 1447935323822.jpg (88KB, 400x319px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 400x319px

>He uses some sort of pop culture reference as a rating scale (i.e. episode names, character names, etc.)
>He uses food or drinks as his rating scale

File: IMG_4734.jpg (50KB, 316x878px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 316x878px

>

2.5 transcendental
2.0 personal favorite
1.5 sufficient
1.0 mediocre
0.5 deplorable

5.0 Masterpiece
4.5 Personal Favorites
4.0 Worth Owning
3.5 Worth Revisiting
3.0 Worth a Listen
2.5 Check Out if Interested
2.0 Mediocre
1.5 Bad
1.0 Not Worth You Time
0.5 Personal Vendetta

File: Screenshot_20161021-131535.jpg (140KB, 857x1413px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 857x1413px

The numbers mean what they mean

>>68588604
Switch "Bad" and "Not Worth Your Time"

5.0 - A
4.5 - A-/B+
4.0 - B
3.5 - B-/C+
3.0 - C
2.5 - C-/D+
2.0 - D
1.5 - D-/E+
1.0 - E
0.5 - F
I don't understand why you'd use a more complex system desu

5.0 good
4.5 good
4.0 good
3.5 good
3.0 good
2.5 not good
2.0 not good
1.5 not good
1.0 not good
0.5 Lulu

Damn everyone here is so shitty at this:

5.0 Masterpiece
4.5 Transcendental
4.0 Great
3.5 Good
3.0 It's Decent
2.5 Eh
2.0 Gross
1.5 You Shouldn't be an Artist
1.0 Worst Thing Youv'e ever heard
.5 Bandcamp shit and Memes

>>68588330
terrible

>>68588810
Why

>>68588447
what is this

5 good
4.5 okay
4 bad
3.5 very bad
3 shit
2.5 awful
2 terrible
1.5 horrible
1 abysmal
0.5 grimes

5 - best
4.5 - bettererer
4 - betterer
3.5 - better
3 - neutral
2.5 - worse
2 - worser
1.5 - worserer
1 - worsererer
0.5 - Sgt. Pepper's

>>68588447
>>68589000
Monogatari girls

>>68588447
see >>68588366
dumb weeaboo

5.0 Masterpiece
4.5 Amazing
4.0 Great
3.5 Good
3.0 Okay
2.5 Mediocre
2.0 Weak
1.5 Bad
1.0 Awful
0.5 Abomination

>>68588765
>>68589640
>>68588653

These are probably ones I'd agree with.

>>68588447
It's not enough that you have dumb memenames as your rating system, but you have atrocious taste in girls too

>>68588447
Cat > Monkey > Crab > Phoenix > Bee > Vampire > Snail >>>> Posed Look > Math >>> Snake

5.0 Masterpiece
4.5 Amazing
4.0 Very Good
3.5 Pretty Good
3.0 Alright
2.5 Okay
2.0 Not Really Good
1.5 Bad
1.0 Very Bad
0.5 Extremely Bad
0.0 Abombination

File: 1396284258025.jpg (166KB, 1920x816px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1920x816px

>>68588447

>>68588447
>shinobu
>4.5
You were so close to being right

File: Udklip.png (9KB, 211x434px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 211x434px

>>68588261
>"quite good"
kys
>>68591410
solid rating system

File: Screen Shot 2016-10-21 at 5.29.49 PM.png (26KB, 189x441px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 189x441px

I try to keep a 1:2:4:16:32 ratio going from 5 to 3 of music I like

>>68592371
ugh

File: 7d69da074579d62d8b5afca411f4942d.png (38KB, 551x444px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 551x444px

mine is pretty simple overall. nothing pretentious or retarded

File: Vomit_Cake.jpg (18KB, 480x269px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x269px

>>68588447

>>68592420
>nothing pretentious
>worship
hmmmmmmmmm, what did he mean by this?

>>68588330
trying too hard

File: Screenshot (48).png (14KB, 195x483px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 195x483px

>>68588261
mine is the only one that actually works, i don't pile everything at the top or the bottom

>>68588330
>No 5
>Not using the full scale
Disregarded

>>68588261
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5 Why

>>68588604
Perfect system if you do what >>68588663 says

>>68588366
fuck these piss me off so bad

katie the cat

>>68589640
This, and only this.

5.0 - Perfect
4.5 - Special
4.0 - Incredible
3.5 - Very good
3.0 - Good
2.5 - Decent
2.0 - Boring
1.5 - Bad
1.0 - Annoying
0.5 - Very annoying