STONES COVER BEATLES (Come Together)

Who gives a shit?

>>68339885
>first time
>in their 55th year

Better late than ever, right...

>>68339996
This is like witnessing music history happen right in front of you. The second most iconic 60's band finally doing a cover of song from the most iconic 60's band is a really big deal and will be remembered for a long time. This is a moment to remember. Relax, sit back and enjoy it or go talk about your obscure, indie bands everyone will forget in a few years and leave your cynical comments to yourself. Thanks.

>>68340053
lol stfu

t. someone who mostly listens to dadrock

>>68340053
Again, who gives a shit?

This isn't even the first time they've done a Lennon/McCartney tune.

Jagger's voice in the late 60s would've been perfect for this song, I'll give you that. I could hear it in his voice before I started the video.

Dont really care the audio in that vid is amazing though I wonder if that was a camera mic

>>68340250
The dude's really close to the stage, so maybe he just lucked out with the sound system.

>>68340053
Nigger, I listen almost exclusively to 60s and 70s rock music, and I really do not give a shit about this at all.

>>68339885
they literally covered i wanna be your man in the 60s

>>68340328
they didn't cover it, the song was written FOR them - they released it originally

>>68340328
Nigga, even Paul McCartney said in his concert yesterday that the Stones covered their songs so he is going to cover one of theirs now, implying that I Wanna Be Your Man is Stones' song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoBr9L_iCBU

>>68340053
>will be remembered for a long time

thats a hard no.

>>68340492
just click on 1:07 to hear it, if you want to skip those random animal noises coming from maca's mouth

>>68340202
Totally this. Before the video started I also imagined what it would sound like with his 60's/70's voice and it would have been perfect.

is he really wearing a stones shirt?
what a tool

>>68339885
So what, I saw them do I Wanna Be Your Man like 4 years ago

>>68340998
What the fuck is it with retarded Americans who think members of a band can't wear their own shirts??? I've only come across Americans who whinge about this

>>68340998
He's motherfucking Mick Jagger, he can wear what he wants

>>68339885
Ronnie Wood could have done a better solo than that

i think this is the first time i've ever preferred the original to the stones' cover, and i'm not even a big fan of them

when is that chickenshit Jagger going to cover "I Get Around"?

>>68341338
I agree, all their covers of old blues songs are always fucking great. I'm so glad they're releasing a new covers album this year

File: smug365.jpg (16KB, 326x316px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 326x316px

>>68339885
What If I told you that the beatles, rolling stones, and your favorite rock and rollers are all just low class blues players who suck dick at their instruments?

>>68341765
>smug365.jpg
do you
do you seriously do that
why
why would someone need so many smug anime girls images

>>68341765
>low class blues players
The Stones definitely, yes
>suck at their instruments
The Stones definitely, yes

File: Smug475.jpg (45KB, 628x394px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 628x394px

>>68341799
normies will never understand

>>68341682
There's just something about them covering old blues song that I really enjoy. Cant wait for the album.

>>68340492
HAHAHA Paul is the fucking man. Cover's a song that he and Lennon wrote as a tribute to the rolling stones. Alpha as fuck.

File: 5636.png (148KB, 297x247px)

148KB, 297x247px

Oops you guys accidentally made a thread about a band who hasn't made a listenable album in over four decades covering a Beatles song two days ago.

Pretty embarrassing mistake.

File: 1429840639331.jpg (49KB, 618x481px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 618x481px

>its the current year
>there are /mu/ posters who still unironcally care about and like the stones/beatles
>they havent realized they are low class blues players yet
>they are having discussions about washed up musicians
>implying they were ever good in the first place

File: christopher-lee-dracula.jpg (36KB, 490x618px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 490x618px

>>68341834
>suck at their instruments
>The Stones definitely, yes
Nah, Mick Taylor and Brian Jones disagree

>>68341765
>>68342059
>>68342064


Leave the board. Immediately.

Wasn't their first single literally a cover of I Want To Hold Your Hand?

>>68343297
>>68343297
No, it was a cover of Chuck Berry's Come On. And their second song was I Wanna Be Your Man, which is a song that Lennon and McCartney wrote for them in 1963.

>the rolling stones
>the stone roses
TRS really need to change their name, i keep mistaking these guys w the stone roses

File: 1464105915766.png (151KB, 329x328px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 329x328px

>>68343379
Christ

>>68341975
Kek, that was such a "fake generosity" act , Paul is a master troll

>>68343297
sauce?

>>68343379
What the actual fuck

>>68340250
Yeah, what phone do you think that was?

that sounded a hell of a lot like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zzBOFjrF8Q

>>68345860
kek

Rolling Stones already did a cover of a beatles song sang by ringo, "boys". It was their first tap.

Paul McCartney > Brian Jones > John Lennon > Keith Richards > Mick Jagger > Ronnie Wood > George Harrison > Ringo Star

>>68345860
Blocked in my country...

>>68339885
It doesn't really sound that bad, a nice cover and the comment section is full of annoying sissy faggots who like to suck Beatles' dicks

>>68346639
>Youtube
>cancerous comment section

What a surprise!

>>68340053
Talking about historic moments, Paul McCartney also did Why Don't We Do It In The Road for the first time ever the following day, together with Neil Young on stage!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DX1pQuzmbt0

>>68339885
>For the first time in history, in their 55th year of existence, The Rolling Stones did a live cover of a Beatles song
Wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJCkbbMnEPg

>>68346773
It was not a Beatles cover, it was given to them by Paul & John. Learn how to read, faggot:

>>68340394
>>68340492
>>68343373

>>68346726
awful desu

>>68341847
>475

Why

>>68347314
autism

Daily reminder that the Rolling Stones are better than the Beatles

>>68348734
This right here.

>>68340053
Muh babyboomer music is most important music