REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE WHAT THE FUCK TIS AT LEAST a 7

>>68326283
Oasis are a stunningly average band so getting a just above average score seems pretty justified, rare for Pitchfork.

Oasis made guitar-pop aimed at working class British people laced with tropes and sentimentality lifted from the pub after a football match and the sitting room during Coronation Street. That only works for an audience inside the UK and Ireland and sort of resonates slightly in Europe, but in the US it's completely alien. They are only hyped in that one market due to them pushing specific buttons for a very specific audience that no one else bother with because that audience isn't typically educated culturally so it'd be a waste of time.

Oasis crowds are 50% geezers and 50% posh boys wanting to look 'down to earth' by liking the geezer band.

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:28:36 Post No.68327018
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:28:36 Post No.68327018 [Report]

File: Be Here Then.png (127KB, 565x549px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 565x549px

>>68326972
Found it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20000302031242/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/record-reviews/o/oasis/be-here-now.shtml

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:40:34 Post No.68327224
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:40:34 Post No.68327224 [Report]

>>68326977
And Blur?

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:50:20 Post No.68327399
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:50:20 Post No.68327399 [Report]

>>68326283
If the songs weren't so ridiculously long and so badly mixed, this could actually be a good and enjoyable album.

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:56:08 Post No.68327488
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:56:08 Post No.68327488 [Report]

>>68327018
kek. And by Ryan Shreiber too.

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:57:56 Post No.68327525
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-08 23:57:56 Post No.68327525 [Report]

>>68326283
lol, seriously?
it's at most a 2

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:00:19 Post No.68327559
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:00:19 Post No.68327559 [Report]

File: Oasis - Be Here Now (5.9) (September 1997).png (63KB, 545x512px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 545x512px

>>68327018

He then changed it 2 months later.

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:02:05 Post No.68327582
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:02:05 Post No.68327582 [Report]

>>68327559
>do you think anyone is going to remember a bunch of crap sitting around a pool in 20 years?

lmao

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:08:26 Post No.68327687
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:08:26 Post No.68327687 [Report]

>>68327559
The last paragraph is pure comedic gold

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:15:19 Post No.68327783
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-09 00:15:19 Post No.68327783 [Report]

>>68327582
>Do you think anyone is going to remember me completely changing my review in 20 years?

Yes Ryan.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/