/p4k/ - Nightly Pitchfork Countdown Hypetrain Thread

>>68309039
This thread rejects the rape culture hysteria of Amber Coffman, Jessica Hopper, Ke$ha, Larkin Grimm, Meagan Garvey, Pitchfork, et al.

This thread stands by & supports Amber Coffman, Jessica Hopper, Ke$ha, Larkin Grimm, Meagan Garvey, Pitchfork, et al

>>68309467
>>68309849
WHO DO I BELIEVE??????????!??!?

File: Ravedeath.jpg (211KB, 1452x1452px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1452x1452px

What are you guys listening to?

daily reminder that danny was robbed

>>68310437
great album op

File: July.jpg (486KB, 1440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 1440x1440px

>>68310437

>>68309878
believe women.

>>68310753
I'd rather just grab em by the pussy and do what I want with em

File: LDM_Album_Artwork_no_sticker_400_400_s_c1.jpg (127KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 400x400px

>>68310437

>>68310699
an under the radar waifu. one of the best indie sad girl singer instagrams. knows what she has.

File: beachclap.png (429KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 1920x1080px

>>68310437

2 minutes until le pan

Where were you when Trump 2016 was kil?

where the reviews at wtf

NIGHTLY RUNDOWN
Oasis 5.3 by Laura Snapes
Helado Negro 8.1 by Matthew Ismael Ruiz
DJ Mustard 6.9 by Sheldon Pearce
Opeth 6.7 by Andy O'Connor

>>68311133
this election has truly been a ride

>>68310806
The Sister and July are two great albums, perfect in their own way, among my favorites for the decade 2bh

>>68311133
>implying

after all the dumb and offensive shit he said, his supporters aren't going to jump ship after one more

>>68311093
i thought you liked vicki. why post a cap with her double chin?

>>68311159
>one of the most agonizing listening experiences in pop music.
>5.3

that's pretty generous. 6s and 7s confirmed to be in the "barely tolerable" range then

File: 353.png (337KB, 760x1460px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 760x1460px

Huh.

Really makes you think.

>reviews with a history lesson
no thanks. i thought laura snapes was in her twenties. how does she know all that shit about oasis? wikipedia?

>>68311263
>three different writers
>20 years apart

like you haven't changed your mind. what is surprising about that? the only real problem is that p4k doesn't keep their old reviews up to keep dummies like you from crying foul over imagined revisionism

>>68311240
This is their old scale
10.0: Essential
9.5-9.9: Spectacular
9.0-9.4: Amazing
8.5-8.9: Exceptional
8.0-8.4: Strong
7.5-7.9: Very good
7.0-7.4: Not brilliant, but nice enough
6.0-6.9: Has its moments, but isn't strong
5.0-5.9: Mediocre; not good, but not awful
4.0-4.9: Just below average; bad outweighs good by just a little bit
3.0-3.9: Definitely below average, but a few redeeming qualities
2.0-2.9: Heard worse, but still pretty bad
1.0-1.9: Awful; not a single pleasant track
0.0-0.9: Breaks new ground for terrible

>>68311312
the first two were literally written by the same guy

not to mention that same guy is also the founder/CEO of p4k

>>68311312

The first two were written by the same guy within the span of 3 months

>>68311312
the first two reviews are by ryan schreiber. one in july 97, and the other in september 1997.

>>68311348
>>68311394
>>68311460
pitchfork was pretty much just Schreiber's blog back then. still don't see a problem.

File: behind the scenes at p4k.png (30KB, 1218x446px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 1218x446px

Today I shall remind them

>>68311569
the problem is you were wrong when you said there were three reviewers.

>>68311857
>missing the point