When will /mu/ realize that overdetailed art is fucking cheesy shit?

Is this a daily thing now?

>>68299938
still buttmad about people making fun of your pathetic inkblot album?

>>68299938
were you cucked by a maiden fan or something?

why is the entrance is through his dick

>>68300067
maybe it aint a penis

>look mom i posted it again xddd

>>68299938
fuck off, minimalism is cancer

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3021x2982px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3021x2982px

>>68299938

It ain't cheesy. I love it so much I got it today.

>>68300067
Shit, can't unsee now

Yah its cheesy, Maiden art is supposed to be cheesy. Thats why its great

>>68299938
idfaf about iron maiden but this is a nice cover

This is actually one of the lesser cheesy Maiden covers.

>>68299938
you have to realize, dumbshit, that this was made in an era where brand recognition and album art is all one had to go off of when shopping for new albums.

we have this bait every day

>>68299938
This thread again? Or am I spending too much time here.

>>68300259
hurr durr please explain everything to me hurrr huurrrr i don't get symbolism huuurrr duuurrrrr

>>68299938
Actually, looking the cover in that resolution I think it's pretty cool. You get a pretty huge sense of scope.

>>68299938
>the album art affects the way the music sounds

Powerslave >>>> ink blot

reminder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNXk1CFVvFc

Just look up all the hidden shit in Maiden album covers and you'll love them

File: tfwgottrolled.png (126KB, 427x356px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 427x356px

>tfw shit posting about iron maiden
I love this album, but...
I can sense there is bait here, OP.

>>68301616
What is this

>>68299938
i don't think I've ever seen the cover this up close before. It's pretty great actually.

Post the cover with the circle

>>68299938
>midleft statue
WE

>I'm gonna shitpost about album covers
>I know I'll post the cover of one of the best albums of all time
lol

File: erictaxxon.png (26KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 2000x2000px

>>68302456

File: powerslavevs.png (1MB, 1500x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x750px

Which one /mu/?

File: 2016-03-28 2016-05-17 001 009.jpg (43KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 400x400px

>>68299938
Just because it is detailed does not mean it is overdetailed. Your picture is in fact an example of an underdetailed picture, as there is hardly any attention on the sculptures texture, attempt at realism on the middle bandaged face as well as its eyes, and sculpture detail of the sculpture faces to its left and right (along with many many more other faults, but you can pick them out yourself.) Yes, a lot of things are going on in your photo, but that actually causes it to be less detailed.

>>68304218
what is the album on the right

>>68304354
Iron Maiden - Powerslave

>>68304218
Powerslave

File: OiT.jpg (906KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

906KB, 1920x1200px

What can you find?

>>68304218
right

File: yesyes-relaye_26.jpg (898KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

898KB, 1500x1500px

>>68299938
Not always

File: 17795-sleep-jerusalem-and-dopesmoker-1366x768-comic-wallpaper.jpg (198KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1366x768px

>>68305002

>>68304218
me on the left

>>68299938
If you think that's "overdetailed" you're probably a limp wristed nu-male that thinks TNGHT is party music and Frank is a hilarious comedy

Just because something's lamer doesn't mean it's more interesting, that's basically the entire basis of why people make fun of hipsters

File: In Sides.jpg (86KB, 498x500px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 498x500px

(not true, by the way)

>>68304218
http://www.strawpoll.me/11384883