It's shit
>>68210039
Why are you in private browsing
>>68210039
Charge your phone nignog
>>68210039
I actually got a little booty blasted seeing that score, but then I remembered that this is the same publication that gave MBDTF a 10 and Kel Valhaal's album a 3.5, so I don't really give a fuck.
I mean they start this review by saying he's an auteur, then they go on to give it an 8.5? They're just jerking off their english degrees at this point I swear to god
>>68210081
Good idea
that's exactly the score it deserves, it's really great
nothing NEXT-LEVEL like niggas on the moon or derbe respect, alder
>same score as jeffrey
>>68210113
Nothing NEXT LEVEL like anohni's album right?
Pitchfork will remain a punchline until they give albums their due
legit score, even higher than expected desu.
>Bon Iver 9.0
>Danny Brown 8.5
Old got a higher rating too. I had hoped p4k wouldn't climb autist mountain again, but they dun reached the peak.
Bon Iver confirmed better than Danny Brown
>>68210168
Holy shit you're right they gave Old an 8.7. Pitchfork is such a hack website
>>68210188
I will kill you
>>68210147
nothing next level on either
>p4k is still shilling on /mu/
pathetic
>>68210206
I liked Old too, but AE is miles above Old
>>68210298
Oh I agree with both those points. I think AE deserves a 9.3
>>68210039
Whats with this shitty album? I had a hysterical laugh from how hard it tries to be "experimental". Its the worst thing I've heard this year and I've heard a lot of bad things.