why is this so fucking good

>>68170970
on my 5th listen senpai

It was really just okay though. It had one of the absolute best songs of the year but not much else.

>>68170991
which

>>68171001
'No'. I have a musical fetish for strong Latin influences.

The first two tracks were pretty decent too, but I think that they could have benefited from being a bit shorter.

>>68170970
Because Jaar is the greatest living musician.

>>68170970

A poor man's Manu Chao, specially the track 'No'

>>68171639

>I think that they could have benefited from being a bit shorter

Truly the sign of an absolute pleb

Boring, m8

File: 1460016159739.jpg (108KB, 977x977px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 977x977px

>>68172017
>longer track = patrician
gr8 b8 anon

>>68171793
>Manu Chao
thanks, wishlisted

>>68170991
>>68171639
>>68171793
>>68172108
>>68172195
God, /mu/ is so fucking shit now. At least elaborate and especially don't post with a trip if your taste is absolutely boring and plebeian.

Listening to it for the first time now, it's pretty boring

>>68172319
Let me guess you're 2 min into the first track and giving up because you can't even pay attention to abstract music...

>>68172347
I'm almost done with No

>>68172239
Based upon this thread, there have been stronger arguments for why the album isn't good, or for why it could have been better.

"why is this so fucking good" as an OP post has literally no argumentative power.

>>68172347
>2 minutes of ambience is abstract art

Lmao. Album is a 8-9/10 though

>>68172347
>Nicolas Jaar
>abstract

He just has a more than half-assed production style, anon.

Doesn't really beat the masterpiece which is Space Is Only Noise.

But still easily top 5 this year.

'No' is absolute fucking eargasm. He should sing more in spanish.