Chart Thread

>>68152704
Delete now pls
Go bach to leddit

File: latest.jpg (4MB, 1781x4325px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1781x4325px

>>68152719
>posting the shit "sub-mucore" version

>>68152810
still better than this one

>>68153088
not true btw

>>68152810
>latest.jpg
>it's actually outdated and shittiest version of this chart

>>68153109
there are two versions of this one and >>68152719 is obviously worse

Post some a e s t h e t i c - core please. I lost them.

>>68153137
>>68153093

>>68153137
>>68152810
>>68153093
No. Your chart is fucking worse.

>>68153137
no, it's actually better, and they finally removed this "p4k-core" bullshit

>>68153160
>sub-/mu/core
>the redeemer
>beck
>james ferraro
>primus
>korn
>around the fur

>>68152719
Is superior to
>>68152810

A lot of these albums don't get praised by Pitchfork (the music selection is also overall better with a few exceptions)

>>68153443
pitchfork-core never implied it was praised by pitchfork
sub /mu/-core however implies they are the most popular albums here after the actual /mu/core, which they are not

>>68153199
>>68152810
ITCOCK is more /mu/core than Deathconsciouness and the Pitchfork-core shit is ridiculous

>>68153474
Why not fucking "Recommended Modern Music" then, makes more sense than both Pitchfork-core or sub-/mu/core

>>68153199
>shit-talking Primus
>doens't even mention Macintosh Plus
You need to go back

>>68153474
>pitchfork-core never implied it was praised by pitchfork
???

>>68153474
>they should keep this meme in this chart

>>68152810
>/mu/core
>no ITCOTCK
WEW LAD

>>68153474
You're pretty fucking dumb if you think that this improvement is not for better.