How is this Dance-Punk?

It's dancy and punky

>that filename

because it's shit. like all dance punk

>>53753515
you're shit

>>53753515
but Gang of 4 and first Liars album

>>53753577
>it's shit. like all dance punk

>>53753595
how

I don't get why people call LCD Soundsystem dance-punk. Literally nothing punk about them, they're really just indie pop with a disco influence

Because that shit's the jam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al2sb80sm0I
Is this dance punk?

>>53753595
>>53753515
your taste is shit

>>53753463
What does Jack White have to do with all this?

DFA 1979's EP and first LP is all you have to listen to, OP. They're godly records. The new one, not so much.

LCD Soundsystem is pretty good but different.

>>53753671
just bc they were part of the nyc dance punk scene (yyy, the rapture)

>>53753945
I've already listened to every album. They're good, but they don't really seem to have anything in common with other Dance-Punk bands.

Also a big LCD fan too.

>>53754017
Yeah, I agree, but that's why I love them. Never really was interested in getting into dancepunk after I heard them or LCD.

That said, 65daysofstatic is very good too, in the same vein as LCD but less 'punk', check them out,

>>53754017
Totally misread your OP, not a fan of dancepunk so I don't know.

>>53753577
I feel you on that first Liars album.