Predict the Box office and the Rotten Tomatoes score

>>30802440
40 million

55%

>>30802440
120 million, 88%

>>30802440
2 million
03%

>>30802440
$350 million, 71%

>>30802440
$3 billion
100%
sweeps the Academy Awards

>>30802440
Flop.
Will kill what's left of the fandom

>>30802440
70 - 80 Million
65%

>>30802440
Enough to get even but not enough to make a sequel. Rotten score around 50% mostly bogged down by generic writing and stolen elements from Disney movies. But it will not be considered bad because of nostalgia and songs. It will just fade away mostly unnoticed.

60%
Barely breaking even, but sequels because of merch.

96%
$100 mil domestic
$300 mil ww
Wins Oscar for Best Original Song

65mio domestic
10mio foreign
45%

>>30802762
this
if Smurfs can flop and still get at least one sequel and a reboot, then mlp will get a couple more movies regardless of how bad it does

I'm more worried about bomb threats for anyone going to go see it

File: 1487629991812.png (492KB, 540x663px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 540x663px

>200mil domestic to break even

25mil
15%

File: big_boss_salute.gif (941KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 350x200px

>>30802789
I couldn't imagine dying in a better way than that.

Just look at Winnie the Pooh (2011), a 2d animated film with the same perceived target audience or really an even wider target audience considering it's more gender neutral. It only had a 7.8m opening weekend though there was some things that could have stifled it like being around Harry Potter's release. MLP will likely follow suit somewhere between 7m-15m opening. As for Rotten Tomatoes. I think the inclusion of Sia in such a lazy will cause critics to immediately discredit it as another shitty franchise cash grab. I'd guess around 30-40%.

File: Highest_grossing_animated_films.png (86KB, 611x1273px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 611x1273px

Here's some animated films for comparasion

>>30802440
10 mil
0%

>>30802440
$185,000,000
76%

>>30802440
35M
Rotten Tomatoes won't even touch it.

>>30802440
Who the hell is sia and why doesnt have a last name?

>>30802909
She's a singer and it's just a stage name.

>>30802440
^175+ mil.
2%

>>30802956
(thug life)

>>30802440
1 trillion
100%

File: b9b49474ef93c40b5e19cea635d0d391.png (121KB, 600x586px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 600x586px

>>30803275
>trillion

>>30802789
>if Smurfs can flop

???

Smurfs 1 was a massive success. Seriously made 560 million. http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=smurfs.htm Then the sequel bombed, so they rebooted.

>>30803301
>patreon in a nutshell

>>30802440
$36 million, 20%

>>30802440
93% fresh.

Domestic $367 million, $850 million once international screenings are added.

>>30802571
I don't how a shitty movie could kill the fandom. It's happened 4 times, and we're still here.

>>30802789
the smurfs was made to be Ipod bait and be "cozy", the kind of stuff to take a 4 year old of any gender to and get them to shut up.

its a safer kind of movie, and doesn't carry the girls stigma of MLP-- parents aren't going to take their boys to see MLP, they will take both their girls and boys to see smurfs.

>>30802440
120 millions. Enough to not be a flop, not enough to get a sequel.

28 million

40%

>>30802440
100 million
45%

The critic scores will be average to below average.

The user reviews will all be 5/5 scores from all the bronies and horsefuckers.

>>30802440
X Million with 30%

File: pone movie, not perfect.png (775KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 1366x768px

>>30802440
200 million

95%

>>30802762
are you high? You can't just "break even" and get sequels, even if you have high merch sales.


Look at power rangers. It sold over 100 million (more than it cost), and had RECORD BREAKING toy sales and rents/dvd sales, but its not getting any sequels because it didn't sell 300+ million like transformers or TMNT.