The movie is going to have an art book.

>>29920872
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz5WCbQQBec

>>29920872
>Sparity
Good god, would they just drop it already?

At least we know it'll be shit

>>29920872
I can't wait to see the autistic rage this movie causes.
>REEEE POSTING CATS ON A PONY BOARD REEE
>ANTHRO ANTHRO ANTHRO REEEEEE

>>29920926
They're just appeasing the Shipfags, I wouldn't really worry about it.Rarity has made it pretty obvious she isn't interested in Spike romanticlly too.

>>29920872
I'm not actually surprised.

Whether it's the reworking of sprites and animations for existing characters or the new "art" directions with anthroshit, they're obviously going new directions with the film. You think they're going to miss the chance to cash in on that? An art book is literally just collaging together existing sketches, concepts, and assets plus tossing in some one-paragraph statements from artists and directors. Of course they were going to do it.

>>29920967
Why
This one is canon unlike the Monster High shit

>>29920872
the movie is gonna have several toy lines, a comic series, a novel, maybe two, at least one sequel even if it bombs(see, straight to DVD), a sticker book, Halloween costumes, candy merch, and a goddamned live action Broadway interpretation.

>thinking hasbro isnt going to milk it dryer then a desert.

>>29921001
>canon
Until we see this cat at least mentioned in FiM it's not canon.

File: Glimmerface.png (479KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1280x720px

>>29921017
>The Sunshitfags are already THIS mad

>>29921017
Opal will become a bipedal aberration in S9

>>29921026
Nice falseflag dude.

I absolutely love how squishy Fluttershy looks in that picture, along with showing her ears going back. One of my biggest concerns about the new ears was them looking less expressive/stiffer than the ones in the show. I really hope that cover is a reflection of the animation.

>>29921017
I don't think it'll be as easy to disregard this as it would EqG. This is the same ponies in the same world made by the same show runners the show had before they started working on the movie.

>>29921040
So everything EqG has?

>>29921040
>the same world
But they're leaving Equestria.

>>29921034
>Muh falseflaggers

Take off your tinfoil hat.Not everything you come across is a falseflag.

File: fast boop.png (254KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 600x600px

>>29921034
Why would I falseflag?
It's funny seeing someone shill a hideous barbie so hard and get so mad when they realize she will NEVER EVER be on the show

>>29921040
FiM is obviously canon to the movie, but movie isn't necessarily canon to FiM. If the show will treat the movie like it didn't happen at all - it's as good as not existing in the first place, in regards to the show that is. If they even drop something "remember this thing happened, crazy huh?" it will confirm it happening in FiM.

>>29921078
People like you don't know how canon works
Something can be canon to something else without mention
If that weren't the case then you couldn't make anything canon after the original product stopped being made.

>>29921088
>Something can be canon to something else without mention
What difference does it make if it's canon or not if in FiM there will be zero consequences of the movie? If nothing changed in the show after the movie, nothing new was added, nothing was lost and nothing from the movie is ever mentioned - why consider it canon?
Do you really need to confirm to yourself that Capper the Cool Cat exists in FiM if he's never mentioned and never appears? Why does it matter at all?
>If that weren't the case then you couldn't make anything canon after the original product stopped being made.
That's not the case because it doesn't work both ways. FiM is canon to the Movie, it uses characters and setting from FiM. The other way around will only be true if FiM uses characters and setting from the movie or at the very least references is verbally.
I'm curious, do you consider G4 canon to G3.5 and vice versa? If so, why?

>>29921150
>Why does it matter at all?
Because it's part of worldbuilding you fucking retard?
Why should I instantly discard everything that happens in the movie as "lol didn't happen xD" when there's no reason to?

>The other way around will only be true if FiM uses characters and setting from the movie or at the very least references is verbally.
No, it would be true if it's set in the same universe, under the same brand, uses the same characters, is written by the same people, and is clearly intended to be part of the same series, which are all objectively true
Do you think the Ed Edd n Eddy movies aren't canon to the series because they aren't mentioned in the show?

>I'm curious, do you consider G4 canon to G3.5 and vice versa? If so, why?
No, you fucker, because G4 takes place in a whole different universe and has established lore that's entirely different.

File: 1492668457082.jpg (248KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1000x1000px

>>29921027
>S9
I never thought we would ever use those two characters together, but it's looking increasingly likely that we will.

I can't wait

>still no trailer

What the FUCK are they even doing?

>>29921230
They know it'll be shit
Just look at the teaser

>>29921189
Are you one of those people who can't enjoy something just because it's not canon? Fanfiction can be good as well you know, nothing wrong in liking it. And I am taking a hypothetical situation, I'm sure the show will reference the movie at some point. But it is a possibility.

>Because it's part of worldbuilding
What worldbuilding can there be in a situation where the movie doesn't get acknowledged in the show? If it doesn't affect the world there's no building upon it.
>Why should I instantly discard everything that happens in the movie as "lol didn't happen xD" when there's no reason to?
You don't understand, I'm not telling you to discard the movie no matter what. What happens in the movie shouldn't be discarded when you're discussing the movie itself. When talking about the show there is no reason to NOT discard it, IF nothing in the show indicates it happened at all. If there are no consequences of it happening it literally doesn't matter. It happened in the movie but if it didn't affect the show it only happened in the movie. Why is that a problem?
>clearly intended to be part of the same series
If you want to be pedantic it clearly doesn't have Friendship is Magic under there. The movie uses all the things from FiM because it's a movie based on FiM, but it's not a part of its continuity if FiM doesn't acknowledge its existance.

Let me ask you again, if any movie character won't appear or be referenced in FiM after the movie, why should I consider it canon to the show? Labeling it "canon" wouldn't matter at that point, it's a non-factor.
What if something in the show will contradict the movie? Will you still have the desire to slap "canon" on it just because it has the same name?
You seem to focus on the word "canon" itself without taking into account what it implies. It doesn't matter to me if you consider the Movie canon (if FiM won't support it), or EQG, or comics. You can do it if you want if you're not a cunt about it.

>>29920872
>sighs
>Opens wallet

>>29921342
How do you use that weird green colored text? I just came from reddit, lol :p

>>29921401
oh my GOD

>>29920872
and it'll come out a week before the movie, spoiling it for those of us who WANT to go see it in the theater

>>29920872
That's nice, 10 pages of pony and Spike, and 40 pages of Literally Who characters I don't care about.

Not going to buy it, probably will not even download the free scans either.

File: supesbats.png (112KB, 400x374px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 400x374px

>>29920872
>dat Spike

>>29922582
On the other hand it could act like pulling off a bandaid - you know it's going to be painful as fuck so you test the waters a bit and tug just a bit off first so you don't damage the skin and then go for the rest, crying like a bitch.

File: 1487459530317.png (365KB, 523x442px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 523x442px

>>29920872
Why the hell are Rainbow's wings so huge?

real trailer when?

>>29923663
When you sacrifice your first unborn son.

>>29920872
Look at those BUTTS

File: buttsmith.png (122KB, 647x901px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 647x901px

>>29923704
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaN8sQK1ang

>>29923720
Is pencils alive?

>>29920926
>>29920989
Oh dear, that would be definitely something if she would finally reject his advancements, as they would need a MOVIE for that, rather than episode.

>>29921342
>>29921189
>>29921150
Umm, isn't there something like canon-compatibility level or "expanded universe"
Isn't the rule of "expanded unvierse" that excerpts from origin, but cannot influence the core canon?

>>29921342
Shitquestria Fucks apologists need to be slaughtered and left to bleed out on the floor.

That's all there is to it. Nothing more and nothing less.

>>29921233
Did they ever upload a fixed version.
if so is it even possible to find the old fucked version.

>>29924496
They never fixed it. Lionsgate has more important things to do than care about some girly cartoon's taser.

>>29924434
>expanded universe
Yeah, it pretty much works like that. We already have EQG and comics to form it but I hope that at least the Movie will be recognised in the show after it.

File: 085.png (229KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 500x375px

>Crested horns
>Mane detail
>Bodies already look more fluid than the show

aw shit

>>29921342
How many things from episode to episode can be "discarded" due to irrelevancy to the rest of the show? How bout that tentacle monster from Three's a Crowd? Don't think that's been referenced since. Actually I'm not sure if any of the events of that episode have been alluded to since (could be wrong). Is it still canon?

Why should the canonicity of the movie be called into question purely due to it being a different medium? What tangible difference does that make? Is the show's "being a show" really what determines its and other entries' credibility to the narrative?

>why should I consider it canon to the show?
Why is this even a question? Aren't you making this more complicated than it needs to be simply by voicing the doubt at all? Why should something's "canonicity" be up for your or anyone's consideration at all?

>>29920989
They should have appease them with FlutterCord. No little girl gives a fuck about Spike and Rarity since they recognise the maturity difference. Years of shipping adult Disney characters made them more aware of that.

>>29920872
This looks fucking amazing, much better than the models from the trailer.

>>29920926
Is basically a re-make of S1 to introduce newfags to the franchise. Only differnece is that Twilight is a princess already.

However Discord and Starlight don't exist, yet.

>>29921040
Unless they mention the evenets in the movie in the main show then it is as canon to FiM as EQG and IDW comics.

Which i doubt. Its probably self contained with S1 tier dynamic of mane6 while secondary characters are replaced by new one shot characters that will only appear in the movie.

>>29924587
>Is it still canon?
>Is the show's "being a show" really what determines its and other entries' credibility to the narrative?
If it's not in the show, it's extended universe. Nothing wrong with that. It doesn't determine the quality of the product and it doesn't affect my judgement of it.
>Aren't you making this more complicated than it needs to be simply by voicing the doubt at all?
No, actually it's making it simpler. When discussing the show we discuss the show itself, without taking into account EQG, comics and other things. It's what the arguments are based on usually. Ultimately it's a convenience for discussion and, again, I'm not trying to regulate what you enjoy or something. It's semantics at this point. The movie will probably be smart enough to drop all the new plot points and characters before it ends, leaving no loose ends that could disrupt the status quo. Otherwise brace yourself for capperposting of glimmer magnitude. Oh who am I kidding, it's gonna happen anyway.

Can we talk about fucking ponies in this thread instead of humans please? You cancerous fucks manage to make every fucking half-decent pony thread about muh human cartoons

>>29920926
Aw, did the wittle waifufags feelings get hurt

>>29924705
humanfag here, I'd rather talk pony here, humans belong in another thread.

>>29924714
Humans belong in another BOARD

>>29924732
That's not likely though m8, even though we are cancerous piles of shite. It would be best if we stuck to our generals and shit, but that never happens, sorry for that.

>>29924613
Twilight will be no longer a princess in the future.

>>29924931
Fuck off south park tard.

>>29922801
Why are her legs so small?

Will you Anons be okay with the art style in the movie if it ends up looking like that cover >>29920872 throughout it?

>>29924972
Shut up, you jackass! Hasbro will lose money after the movie is a failure and lose million dollars in the fall!

>>29925161
You are a pathetic and useless person who will never be happy in your entire life.

>>29925176
HEY, you IDIOT! I'm born in the 90s and I had a good life and I support Disney and Mattel and I'm still against Hasbro and I'm also a fan of Thomas & Friends, MLP, LPS, and Ed, Edd n Eddy! And I'm also a fan of NASCAR and WWE!

>>29922801
>>29925106
Forced perspective

>>29925209
>Thomas & Friends
>WWE
Literally mentally damaged autist. Kill yourself. Seriously. I'm not even joking.

>>29925249
Jesus, calm down.

New horse in 40 bings, go watch it and you will potentially feel better

File: 1492122171007.png (246KB, 512x743px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 512x743px

>>29925209
>Thomas and Friends
everytime

>>29925249
Go to hell! My favorite storyteller are Ringo Starr, Geogre Carlin, and Alec Baldwin in S1-S7.

>>29920872
Loving the IDW style wings.

>>29924709
They keep forcing it even though Rarity has shown she has no intrest of being in a romatic relationship with Spike.Its something that was concluded a long time ago.They're just catering to shipfags.

>>29925400
The wings still makes her racist, faggot!

>>29925488
Your autism still makes you a waste of life.

>>29925543
No, it's not you idiot! Austim are smart people!

>>29925700
Yes, they are. And you are just retarded.

>>29926673
NO, I'M NOT AND SHUT THE bleeped UP! McCarthy and Vogel are retarded people!

>11
What!?

File: model.jpg (39KB, 287x344px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 287x344px

>>29925400
That exists in the show now you know, even outside a certain ruined character.

File: full (1).png (1MB, 1522x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1522x1080px

>>29921230
We learned at BABS that the movie if currently undergoing extensive reshoots.

F

File: 1396581368487.png (435KB, 845x470px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 845x470px

>>29927967
Can we assume the pegasus reassignment surgery was a success?

File: 1492055883506.jpg (46KB, 476x475px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 476x475px

>>29928184
>undergoing extensive reshoots.

>>29920872
That looks fantastic
I'll buy it probably if it's anything like The Art of Equestria

>>29928184
>extensive reshoots.
Going to have to rephrase and elaborate there.

>>29928309
"Reshoots" was the word used. Figure it out. When a live action movie undergoes a test screening and bombs, the studio may order reshoots to try and salvage the movie. This process can involve dramatic changes to plot points, the introduction/removal of characters, and the addition/deletion of scenes or bits of dialogue. Suicide Squad and Rogue One both involved heavy use of reshoots, for example.

Surely you can figure out what that means in this context.

Bag

>>29928943
Hopefully they're getting rid of all those ridiculous anthro characters.

File: Over the edge.jpg (93KB, 638x866px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 638x866px

>>29924438
Wew lad

>>29930262
Those anthro will steal your mama

>>29928943
Well this isn't live action. Do you mean re-animating/recording?

>>29920872
I'm not gonna read it.

>>29933132
That is how I interpret what was said. I thought "reshoot" was an odd choice of word for an animated movie, but that's what was said. Maybe don't be so autistic and literal minded.