Extreme leftist pony is best pony

File: 1491117061618.png (691KB, 2086x2086px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 2086x2086px

>>29794878
Let's agree to disagree.

>>29794878
>>29794898
Aryanne and starlight fucking when?!

>>29794878
Glimmer was a caricature of socialism by people who don't understand it or, more likely, have a reason to distort it for their gain.

>>29794911
The fuck are you talking about, Glimmer was 100% communism

File: 1100117.png (2MB, 2200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2200x1600px

>>29794910

>>29794921
And here, we see the people who don't understand it. Or, a troll.

>>29794930
Put up or shut up, what about it makes it socialist rather then communist ?

>>29794938
Nothing, literally nothing, makes it either. Truth be told I used the word "Socialism" as a training wheel.

Lenin actually wrote a piece about a professor, Tugan-Baranovsky, that is scary reminiscent of that whole episode's premise. Here's a link: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm

>>29794878
>left
>best
die

>>29794878
Debatable.

File: bloody harlot.png (629KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 1280x1280px

>>29794878
>hates the concept of cutiemarks
>leftist

File: pinochet glim.png (190KB, 1493x1300px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1493x1300px

>>29794878

File: horseshoe theory.png (15KB, 416x266px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 416x266px

>>29794878
>>29794898
Leftie horse and rightie horse actually share the same trait:

They're both shit.

Horseshoe theory has alwys been pseudo-logical bullshit.
Truthbomb: the center does not exist. "Centrism" essentially amounts to a giant middle ground fallacy. yourlogicalfallacyis.com/middle-ground
A mental trick to use on oneself for people to feel better about knowing nothing.Understand that centrism is still a claim to political interest. The left and the right (period) are lines that do not actually connect despite what we've been told. A "center" implies a value of Zero between the two. What exists "between" the left and right is a void, nothing. Not "zero" but a null value; *and it's name is being apolitical*. Liberalism being "left" and opposed to conservatism is to misunderstand (and many """report""" on this misunderstanding purposefully) the nature of these terms. In the past "Liberalism" was used as shorthand to what was actually meant: "more liberal action" "liberal progress never slowing". Now we have the term "Progressive" which reflects the actual interplay of terminologies going on. The left of old essentially claimed the mantle of ""Liberalism"" to imply their opposition wasn't. Even the right fell for this. The truth is that both are Liberal; just that in the left's case they are Progressive Liberals. Which in reality is falsely Liberal.
(p1)

>>29795719
>>29796536
(p2)
The thing Conservatives are trying to *conserve* is Classical Liberalism. Which is to say the liberalism of the founding fathers. We Conservatives know that Liberalism has two forms: conserving liberal values, and progressing liberal values. We Conservatives also know that activism is a bell-curve on a graph; that on that graph there is such a thing as too much activism and that more and more of it starts to degrade society where previously it improved it. The Progressive (which is to say wrong) view of Liberalism is that activism for it must keep going more and more never stopping. The Conservative view of Liberalism states that the "sweet spot" can be reached and once activism starts to go too far and starts to harm, we must then conserve the best, provably working, amount of perfect realistic Liberalism.

Look to Wikipedia's and Google's assertion (in the first paragraph even) that Fascism is "right-wing" (implying in effect that it cannot be left-wing). Let me describe to you the nature of Fascism: Despite the lie often repeated by these leftist faux-journalist comedians (and stormfront know-nothings on /pol/) that Fascism is right-wing, the way you can get to the actual truth of any given term is to go to its *etymology*. It's birth. Fascism was named from how Benito Mussolini (a socialist) coined it. It comes from the Italian word for "bundle of sticks"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces.
This was a euphemism for what he wanted for Italy; all the individualsticks that could be, on their own, broken would be tied together in a great socialist bundle that could not be broken. An unspoken implication that any who refused to be joined to this bundle *deserved* to be broken.
So tell me friend: Remember the last time you've seen a black Republican bullied for being an "Uncle Tom"? What you were witnessing was left-wing Fascism. Which is to say just Fascism