Defend this.
*hides thread*
>>28631000
You're_S6_a shit.
>>28631000
Look up Celestia, a pony that's actually supposed to be important.
>>28631177
a.k.a. the 'when everything went to shit' index
>>28631207
All those M's in S1 and 2 is just Twilight writing on her diary
>>28631217
Wait, I mean writing her a report
>>28631222
Being mentioned, and thus having a role to play, yes. Look at that lovely stretch of red, indicating absolutely nothing.
>>28631000
S means... song?
>>28631804
seen, i think. Y is speaking role, S is seen, M is mentioned, and N speaks for itself. B is 'background'.
>>28631000
I can't.
>>28631238
Maybe you should've gotten a waifu who isn't shit
>>28631207
>everything went to shit
No. It's more like "the voice actor's guild demanded more money for Nichole Oliver and it ate into the fucking budget" index.
>>28631000
DT died the moment she got reformed.
>>28631000
Yet people will defend Crusaders of the Lost Mark, literally the worst episode starring CMC
>>28634450
It's true.
>SS suddenly not DT's friend
>This is not further explored
>DT has bitch mother that was never foreshadowed
>CMC get her to drop her guard and open up
>Pipsqueek interrupts
>Suddenly she's a dick again
>Suddenly she's not a dick and stands up to her bitch mother, again with no foreshadowing
>At least 5 minutrs taken from Tiara for the Cutie Marks
>Cutie Marks are shit, don't match the established foreshadowing and clash with all three coats
>Diamond Tiara is suddenly good after 5 seasons of bitchyness that she clearly revelled in before 'lol jk, my mother makes me a dick'
>>28634450
>>28635801
Samefag going hard in multiple threads.
Literally none of that is either necessary for the story they wanted to tell or a charitable interpretation of events.
No one cares about your brony episode review channel.
>>28635801
>>28634450
>not thinking Crusaders of the Lost Mark is the best episode in the series
Disgusting.
>>28635849
It had potential to be among the best, but it simply wasn't possible to do all they wanted to in 22 minutes and have it be fulfilling. It needed to be a 2-parter to work.
>>28633168
huh. hmmm. uh. hm
>>28633168
[Citation needed]