QUALITY inside

File: 1445823921309.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>15194585

File: seed quality.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>15194585

File: QualityGundam.jpg (99KB, 512x1527px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 512x1527px

>>15194585

File: BrawnLives.jpg (101KB, 628x480px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 628x480px

Two of these guys should be dead at this point, and the other is on the wrong side.

>>15194616
Now that is some quality animation.

File: Unreal Engine.gif (2MB, 491x271px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 491x271px

>>15194598

File: 1472188516734.webm (2MB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x576px

>>15194616

File: garbage quality.png (515KB, 746x431px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 746x431px

literally inexcusable

>>15194680
I remember this episode.

>>15194695
If you could point out what is bad that would help.

>>15194604
>perfectly okay in-betweens that look just fine in context are now considered QUALITY
Every time.

>>15194710

Look at the one on the left.

File: gendum.jpg (29KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x300px

>>15194607

>>15194607
to think these were approved by somebody

>>15194607
The bottom one looks epic

File: 1272909490883.jpg (25KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 640x480px

>>15195511
Welcome to 70s TV robot cartoons.

>>15194680
What is this

>>15195527
Transformers G1.

>>15195529
I mean what episode.

Like what's even going on? Are those frog arms? Is that a cat or a gremlin? What are they walking through?

>>15194604
This scene from the special editions or something? I don't remember Strike fighting Calamity close up, but its been years since I've watched SEED.

Oh dear.

>>15194679
That's IdTech6, not UE.

File: vlcsnap-2015-10-29-14h24m32s307.png (841KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 960x720px

Nice coloring on Revil's hat, idiots.

>>15195592
>>15195589
>>15195584
>>15195577
>>15195572
>>15195569
>>15195557
80s anime doesn't count as quality, you can stop posting. I watched first macross yesterday and you can take screencap literally any moment of it and call it quality. I looks BAD.

>>15194607
Anyone have the greentext about these?

>>15195616
For fuck's sake, could you please stop posting every single frame that has slightly different proportions in mid-action? It's okay for an animated show to be expressive, you know - it's what makes it fluid rather than be a bunch of stiff, still shots following one another

>>15195639
But 0079 was actually like that even in key frames. It's legendary for it's QUALITY.

>>15194711
is this porn?

>>15195754
I wish.

>>15195672
>Its legendary for its QUALITY.
It really isn't. Macross is, for example. 0079's animation was just fine for its time. You're being deluded by the same autistic anons that keep posting the same fucking cherry-picked frames over and over again.

File: zambot16.avi_snapshot_19.17_[2017.02.11_22.38.jpg (49KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x480px

>>15195979
This.
You can pick random moments of most shows of that time and they'll look just as terrible if not worse.
You guys seriously need to watch more than your fucking Gundam shows.

File: bakuu.png (365KB, 704x396px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 704x396px

>>15195541
It's ferom the remaster. Sunrise added the Perfect Strike to the battle for Orb.

>>15194680
>>15194616
Come on, anon, posting G1 is not fair. Every second of that show is QUALITY.

File: SDF Macross episode 11.webm (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x240px

>>15195600

>>15196370
And still such a great anime.

>>15195579
Lol go play arkham knight and come say that again.

>>15196386
No, you first, go play Rage and Wolfenstein.

>>15196400

Have and its not as bad as UE. Its been a "feature" for as long as i can remember

>>15194585
Almost every episode of IBO is QUALITY, you picked easy mode kiddo.

>>15195021
uhm, that's pretty on model for a Graze Ritter.

it is just is mostly outlines.
it's a tween.
failed.

I don"t have pics handy but Venus Project Climax has some great stuff

>>15194591
Never skip leg day

File: Dynames snipes.webm (2MB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x404px

>>15197510
>meanwhile 10 years earlier

>>15200895
>dat lazily drifting Exia with shape-shifting inbetweens

It's like it was born to suffer

>>15200895
>>15200956

in motion it looks absolutely great.

this is tween/motion issues, not quality

>>15200956
>nitpicking key frames during animation as QUALITY
Holy shit why is /m/ getting dumb?

>>15200972
Not really, the movement is still rather lazy, consequence of the animators being told to draw a complex and detailed design and maintain early episode level of detail.

The best of the animation is done when Exia is the only subject of the scene, and it's really just glorified poses with the occasional off-screen burst of fire. Once you pull away and see the Enacts the mobility noticeably tanks.

The entire sequence deliberately keeps complexity to as manageable an amount as possible, and due to the Gundams being highly complex designs in S1 you can see they're running up against their own animators' limitations without resorting to these tricks of the trade.

That said, yeah it's still not QUALITY.

>>15201001
>the movement is still rather lazy
Its not. The Exia even in the background is still moving in concert with the foreground and things remain relatively stable.

>>15201043
>The Exia even in the background is still moving in concert with the foreground

And this is somehow worthy of praise... how, exactly?

>>15201063
It's not, dumbass.

You made the claim that it looks bad, but it's simply adequate.

>>15201084
No, I made the claim that it didn't really look "absolutely great" as >>15200972 put it.

Don't call me a dumbass, friend.

>>15201091
>friend
You're not my friend, "chum".

>>15201091
>>15201063
Are you retarded?

>>15201095
I'm not your chum, guy.

>>15201098
I'm not a guy, son.

File: 1457831167554.gif (45KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 100x100px

>>15194679

File: high quality animation.webm (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>15194585
Thought I had a webm of Geist's head bobbing in MD Geist but instead found this.

>>15202321
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZu5iDTtNg0

>>15201100
I was grown in a test tube, pal.

File: LAUGHING GUNDAM FAGOT.png (176KB, 500x460px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 500x460px

>>15195600
>I looks BAD.

>>15202341
Neat, but that's literally Johnny Test tier animation. It's just a bunch of sliding symbols

>>15197469
>a tween
>on model
>implying graze's were always tooth pick thin

>>15200895
It's ridiculous how well 00's animation holds up compared to recent Gundam tv shows (excluding G-Reco).

Did Sunrise lay off a large chunk of their animation department or something?

File: ExiaSet vs EnactPat.webm (3MB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x404px

>>15202518
First HD series plus Mizushima is well known as having a very strong rapport with animators down to the most junior level. Also 00 had 2 or 3 years of pre-production starting development back when SEED-Destiny was still airing.

>>15202518
Studio 3 can be good if they've got the right people in charge (Build Fighters), but they're nowhere near Studio 1's level of expertise and have had rather bad staff helming their most recent shows (Try and IBO).