So with this movie I guess they made a pretty big change in canon to how planetary shields work. I don't recall shield gates being a thing that you could attack and break in order to open holes in the shield.
Things could just work multiple ways.
After Scarif, perhaps gates came to be seen as a security vulnerability.
Perhaps the massive size of the Scarif base justified a gate mechanism compared to the much smaller forest moon base.
Perhaps you don't put an expensive gate on a forest moon of no strategic significance besides being in the middle of nowhere.
Or maybe it's just an inconsistency. Does it really matter?
>>15088126
The Second Death Star's shield being housed on another planetoid always seemed like an exception anyways.
>>15088113
I thought all planetary shields had a sliding door...
>>15088113
I'd say this is a special typpe of shield for protecting the archives. I mean, the idea is that this one is always turned on, so it needs a gate so that it may never be deactivated.
>>15088113
Well in Rogue One, the idea is that the planet is basically one giant testing area for Imperial equipment. Maybe they figured that having an always-on shield and a gate was a more secure option.
>>15088126
Not to mention the shield generator on Endor was designed as a trap for the Rebels. They just didn't anticipate the Ewoks to be recruited to join the Rebels or to be dangerous enough to make a difference.
>>15091206
Nobody expects the Ewok inquisition.
>>15088216
Hard to have internal shields if you haven't installed the generators yet.