Is this chart correct, /m/?
>>14676246
I don't understand it, so no.
>>14676246
>Lupin III part 1
>Ashita no Joe
>any early Tastunoko Pro works
>unmoving
What the fuckkkkkkkkk
Those early - late 70s shows had so much better animation than early 80s shows. Like just compare the actual flow of animation in 0079 to Zeta for example, or the first Tekkaman to the hot garbage trash heap that was Tekkaman Blade
>Yuasa, the animation director the most predisposed to style and abstract animation out of probably any currently mainstream animation directors
>Photorealistic
You shitting me?
Also Digimon Adventure film came out in 1999 not in the 2000s, it's two years older than FLCL.
>>14676686
Maybe they mean how he uses actual photographs in some of his work, kind of like SHAFT
But seriously, I don't think the bottom flowchart has much to do with the two middle bands, it's just there to show animation influences, where it's still missing a few obvious links
It should be a big block that just says "shit" after 1985.
>>14676246
This chart is so fucked in many places it's not even funny.
>>14676875
Here's your (You) shitposter.