Is anything good?

>>14271113
I'm really fucking tired so reading each of those tiny ass titles isn't gonna happen. From what I did skim over though I'd say at least 50% of that list isn't even /m/. Come back with a more concise, /m/ appropriate list and make it fucking readable.

>>14271140
How bout you come back when you have a fucking computer instead of a phone?

>>14271142
What? I am on my computer. How the hell could I browse /m/ on a telephone?

File: 1448946029917.gif (2MB, 400x308px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x308px

Is anything really good? Is anything really bad?

Watch First Gundam, SDF Macross, Shin Mazinger, and your choice of either a Getter OVA or the manga, and then just start watching other shows that sound interesting to you and see for yourself, we can't decide your tastes

File: VAw0e.jpg (25KB, 720x544px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 720x544px

>>14271140
Also practically everything on that list is considered /m/ to some degree, like Space Battleship Yamato, M.D. Geist, Tekkaman Blade, Casshern Sins, and Tiger & Bunny

>>14271113
It's a list of every /m/ show, of course there's nothing good on it. >>>/a/

>>14271442
>your choice of either a Getter OVA
Shit taste

>>14271113
Normal logic would dictate that about ten percent of everything that's on there is actually good, though I've always thought that point zero one is a more accurate representation of how many actually good works there are in this world.

>>14271716
top kek

>>14271508
hi Carlos

It's shit. All of it. Everything that's ever been created will be shit in some way.

But only you can decide what is less shitty than the other shit.

Brexit will be good.

>>14271113
Has anyone attempted to do manga, book, or live-action TV/film versions of these? I could also go for non-Japanese (and non-Korean, since I think Robot Taekwon is in there) charts.

I was also looking through the anime database year-by-year on MyAnimeList, and I have a vague memory of seeing /m/-looking things missing from these lists. And I'm just talking about going up to 1980.

>>14271882
>Has anyone attempted to do manga, book, or live-action TV/film versions of these? I could also go for non-Japanese (and non-Korean, since I think Robot Taekwon is in there) charts.
No one so far, though video game stuff could also be included as well.

>>14271886
Hm. One day, I'd like to put my programming lessons to use and put together a sortable, sourced database of mecha titles from every medium. (If not every mecha title, at least a database for every Gundam title.) But I bet such databases already exist, and I don't want to produce something redundant.

>>14271113
>2015
>AZ2

Doesn't exist. Unless it does and it was an ova no one saw.