All Terrain Armored Transport Uber Alles!

Unless you need to fire in any direction that is not within a thirty-degree cone in front of you.

Or at the ground.

>>12481141
That scenario is even less likely than some dude having an energy sword and grappling hook cutting a hole in your hull chucking a detonator in!

You can't knock the AT-AT, but in some ways I prefer the AT-TE. Same basic function, but where the former looks like a machine of terror the latter looks like a machine of war, all stocky and bristling with guns.

File: Destroy_Prototype_Facility17.jpg (3MB, 4096x3072px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4096x3072px

Quadrupedal mecha tread?

>>12481141
>Or at the ground.
Just put a few turrets beneath so the thing can shoot at its own legs! ... oh wait

So why is the AT-AT so tall again?

File: original.jpg (99KB, 425x668px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 425x668px

>>12481299
god i hope battlefront kicks ass

>>12481422
same reason for the death star or the fuckoffhuge executor: imperial big dick

>>12481572
>Posting anything related to that abomination
This is not ok

>>12481588
it was all i had on hand. i am ashamed.

>>12481591
All is forgiven if you can find an image of an AT-TE

>>12481133
>uber

AT-TE all the way.
The AT-AT has all that unecessary height.

Wasn't there a level in Empire at War where you had to win using an AT-AT to get them funded and mass produced exactly because the top brass were like "Steve, what the fuck is this shit?"

Are there any female Rebel troopers?

>>12481141

So, all you're saying is it needs more dakka.

Is it wrong I like the LAAT, something about gunships is really awesome.

>>12481907
it is a beautiful thing

File: AT-ST_2[1].jpg (551KB, 1866x1541px) Image search: [Google]

551KB, 1866x1541px

The AT-ST is a far more sensible design. If it had the size and armour of the AT-AT backing it up, it'd be far superior.

It's a fucking camel

>>12482542
They always reminded me more of Elephants.

>>12482552

According to Lucas the idea came from camels.

Though he fucked up by not having both legs on one side move at the same time like camels do. But then that would cause a lot of rocking and probably wouldn't be good for the machine's balance.

>>12481141
Most deployments of AT-ATs typically have infantry and smaller walker support, so that mitigates that possible problem.

>>12481588
Eh, Juno and Kota were pretty okay.

>>12482542
>>12482552
>>12482583
Thy used elephants for the motion study.

File: Macquerrie wampa run.jpg (226KB, 1600x709px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1600x709px

>>12481133
I wish they'd kept Macquerrie's ball-turret design on the nose or at the very least, included a heavy artillery AT-AT variation that had it.

>>12484101
give Rebels a season or two, they've yet to find an old design they didn't like

>>12481911
Here's hoping the LAAT in the Battlefront trailer aren't just set pieces

>>12484107
Nah they're using the movie versions.One of which gets shot point blank by an old AT-TE right in the neck

>>12484101
>>12484149
No, it's something between the two.

>>12481422
Because blaster can't fire in an arc, extra height means they can fire farther.

They say if you calculate the actual height of the AT-ATs main guns you get a distance to horizon of 17.28, which distance they mentioned in TESB.

>>12481953
AT-ST is def my favorite star wars walker.

>>12481953
AT-PT > AT-ST

File: AT-PT.jpg (2MB, 3700x2200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3700x2200px

>>12487742

File: beargguymothafocka.png (158KB, 498x368px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 498x368px

>>12487742
AT-PT for the win! Free Beargguy for you.

>>12481953
>>12487778

I still have ths book somewhere. Probably in pieces at this point.