Essential /lit/ based reading lists. Post them.

>>9988434
>t. fat. anime-watching 'vidya' gamer

File: 1504307675246.jpg (4MB, 2196x3339px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2196x3339px

>>9988434

>>9988434
>Tolkien
>Nietzsche
>reactionary

>>9988434
It's funny how your modern-day 4channer (depressed, antisocial, right-wing, prone to conspiracy theories, "race realist") uses the word "based" to describe things, when they are in fact the least "based" people you can find, the kind of people Lil B, The BasedGod would absolutely talk shit on.

Eumeswil is a mea culpa for Junger's time in the Wehrmacht. It was written way after Evola denounced him as just another liberal. Not really a reactionary work at all, and I'm not sure if there was ever a period in Junger's life when he could be called a reactionary, at least not of the Evola variety.

>>9988441
>Le everything I disagree with is edgy numale.

>>9989826
TLotR has an anti-Industrialist message. I haven't read enough Nietzsche to comment on him.

I wouldn't rub diarrhea off my asshole with your reading list op

>>9989826
>i'm retarded: the post


good job, it's 8am and this thread already gave me my RDI of cancer

Nice thread.

>>9990145
>I wouldn't rub diarrhea off my asshole with your reading list op
yeah most people use toilet paper these days

File: Girls.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>9990431
>He doesn't print out 4chan posts and use them to remove shit from his anal cavities

>>9990431
ye no point wiping a shitty asshole with more shit

some of those books don't even follow subject-predicate

>>9988446
One of the best Greek lists around.

>>9988434
How in the world do you put Cortes and de Maistre on the same list as Evola? The two are staunch Catholics, who abhor ooga booga mysticism of Evola as much as they abhor the French revolution.

File: 1504544248149.png (710KB, 1044x495px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 1044x495px

Essential not what to read.

Where's Louis-Ferdinand Céline and Michel Houellebecq? Robert Michels, G. K. Chesterton, Hilaire Belloc, Heidegger, Mircea Eliade etc...

I wouldn't consider Nietzsche "reactionary", quite on the contrary. However, the early Frankfurt School stuff (e.g. The Dialectic of Englightenment by Adorno and Horkheimer) is actually reactionary stuff, despite its generally socialist outlook.

>>9988434
>twilight of the idols
>reactionary

the actual fuck anon?

File: index.jpg (7KB, 183x276px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 183x276px

>>9988434
larping as a viking isn't reactionary

reading is never essential, if you spend time reading ask your mom to pick up a gun for suicide next time she's out

>>9990061
He's clearly not using it in that sense lad.

>>9990766
How do you even place Belloc and Chesterton in the same box as Heidegger? Pagan larping is to the two about as close as atheism.

>>9991009
"Pagan larpers" and Catholics can't be both "reactionary" if they also oppose each other?

File: 1503304301381.jpg (1MB, 1975x2229px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1975x2229px

One thing I've realised after finishing "The Trial and Death of Socrates", is that I'm not quite sure how to read with the intention of becoming a better critical thinker.

How do I go about this? Will it be overcome by reading further texts, or do I have to carry out additional research?

>>9990061
get that hothead nigger outta here

>>9991095
They can't be meaningfully placed in the same basket, meaning the category of reactionary is quite meaningless. It's like using the term right wing to describe Regan and Hitler, it's so vague it doesn't mean anything.

>>9991108
Not sure what you mean. What did you get out of those dialogues, first of all?

>>9990076
Junger appears in every right wing thread, by people who read Storm of Steel only, and as an action novel.

On the White Cliffs is literally an ex soldier finding peace in an idyllic natural environment, only to have his world thrown upsidedown by fascists, and is a hallmark of inner emigration. there is a reason why Junger wasnt tried under denazification: he despised the Nazis.

I just read Reck's Bockelson: A Tale of Mass Insanity where he uses the Munster Anabaptists as a thinly veiled slap in the face to the goonish Hitler and his thugs and his Diary of a Man in Despair, both excellent conservative works. Reck was a Bavarian Monarchist conservative who saw Nazis as scum and degenerate, causing immense damage to the majesty of the German Empire.

>>9990963
The accomplishments of the Oxford NRSV should always be touted as the best general purpose bible.

>>9990110
If reactionaries are those who are critical of industrialism, then consider Marx and Bakunin reactionaries too.

File: Politique.png (2MB, 1682x1723px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1682x1723px

>>9991108

>>9991158
revolutionaries=/=reactionaries

>>9991158
You are an idiot. Marx wanted even more active industrialisation, because it would accelerate material reality towards communism,

>>9991195
Most of these have english versions mate.

>>9991324
I know but I'm French so I made it in French
It probably seems even more patrician on /lit/

File: 1503410532669.png (729KB, 1202x1856px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 1202x1856px

>>9990588
good bait, brother

>>9991150
>there is a reason why Junger wasnt tried under denazification: he despised the Nazis.

He also refused the denazification process but was investigated by the nazis for potential involvement in Hitler's assassination attempt.

I think the reason for Junger and Carl Schmitt not accept denazification had more to do with an anti-americanism than a loyalty to the nazis.

I think it could be argued that Junger had a reactionary sensibility but 1939 onwards he had basically accepted an aesthetic detachment from politics. I don't think he was a big fan of liberalism or of democracy. I guess he's reactionary in that he sensed that the problems of Europe began centuries ago and would not be solved by either Nazism or liberalism.

>>9990963
Kek