is this a good edition of critique of pure reason?

Hackett or Cambridge, though with Hackett you get the advantage that Pulhar doesn't think Kant is wrong about everything so it's potentially less loaded.

>>9977635
see but my dad has this edition so i could just nab it from him if theres nothing wrong with it

>>9977644
Everyman is top tier

File: kant.png (32KB, 563x561px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 563x561px

>>9977670
gnarly thanks dude

but it does say this on the first page, what should i make of it?

File: 51XwZTErc+L._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (34KB, 333x499px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 333x499px

Thoughts on this edition?

>>9977682
I can't really say anything explicit with regards to Kant. I almost always buy Everyman for literature considering the translations and quality of the books are very good.

The /lit/ guide says to go with either Guyer, Pluhar, or Smith.

Guyer translation ISBN: 0521657296
Pluhar translation ISBN: 0872202577
Smith translation ISBN: 0230013384

I think Everyman would be fine though. Kant is a book you will likely have to re-read again preferably another translator.

>>9977697
I'm more worried about it being potentially abridged? It says "revised and expanded" and "edited" in that pic

>>9977700
When in doubt I would suggest to go with one of the three authors in my previous post. If you are short for cash I'd say to just read the Everyman edition. It is likely that you will not fully grasp Kant by just reading it once and without resorting to secondary literature or lectures.

>>9977707
ok i will, thanks